Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Murine Fetal Echocardiography
Published on: February 15, 2013
Fetal echogenic bowel: Is there a national consensus on identification and reporting?
Trudy Jane Sevens1, Trish Chudleigh2
1Department of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, England.
Insights
Sonographers in England lack a national consensus for identifying and reporting fetal echogenic bowel. This study reveals current practices and disparities, paving the way for standardized guidance to improve maternal and newborn outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Obstetrics
- Fetal Medicine
Background:
- The Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2 emphasizes accurate identification and reporting of echogenic bowel for better maternal and newborn outcomes.
- Currently, no national consensus exists to guide sonographers in identifying and reporting fetal echogenic bowel.
- This lack of standardization can impact the consistency and quality of prenatal screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a national consensus for sonographers on identifying, classifying, and reporting fetal echogenic bowel.
- To establish clear guidelines for the second-trimester anomaly scan within the Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP).
- To address the current disparities in sonographer practice regarding fetal echogenic bowel.
Main Methods:
- A two-phase study was conducted, with Phase 1 focusing on current national practices.
- An online questionnaire survey collected numerical and free-text data from participants.
- Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis, with recruitment via social media and professional networks.
Main Results:
- 95 sonographers completed the survey over 11 weeks.
- Common practice involved subjective identification of echogenic bowel by comparing it to fetal bone, though methods varied.
- Significant disparities were noted in the fetal bone used for comparison and transducer frequencies employed.
- Confirmation of echogenic bowel occurred at the 20-week scan (58%), fetal medicine review (32%), or was uncertain (10%).
Conclusions:
- Disparities persist in sonographer practices for identifying and reporting fetal echogenic bowel across England's national screening service.
- This study provides essential baseline data to inform the development of standardized guidance for sonographers.
- Establishing clear guidelines is crucial for consistent and accurate identification and reporting of fetal echogenic bowel.
Introduction:
Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle Version 2 highlights the importance of correct identification and reporting of echogenic bowel to improve maternal and newborn outcomes. Yet there is no national consensus to guide sonographers in identifying and reporting fetal echogenic bowel. This two-phase study aims to develop a national consensus to guide sonographers on the identification, classification and reporting of fetal echogenic bowel during the Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP) second trimester anomaly scan. Phase 1 results are presented capturing the national current practice of sonographers in its identification.
Methods:
An online questionnaire survey was deployed to capture numerical and free text data. Data analysis was by descriptive statistics. Participants were recruited via social media and through professional networks and organisations.
Results:
A total of 95 participants completed the questionnaire during an 11-week period. Common practice across England included sonographers using a subjective method for identifying fetal echogenic bowel and making comparisons to fetal bone. However, there was wide variance in the fetal bone used and the transducer frequency typically used to assess bowel echogenicity. Confirmation of echogenic bowel was made at the 20-week scan in 58% of cases, 32% following fetal medicine department review with the remaining 10% unsure when confirmation occurred.
Conclusion:
While there is common practice in identifying and report echogenic fetal bowel in some areas, there remains disparity within sonographer practice in England's national screening service. This study allowed baseline data to be collated, providing the first steps towards development of guidance for sonographers in identifying and reporting this appearance.
More Related Videos
14:19Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
06:15Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...