Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025
Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
Published on: June 8, 2019
Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA as a Liquid Biomarker in Uveal Melanoma
Daniel P de Bruyn1,2,3, Natasha M van Poppelen1,2,3, Tom Brands2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Purpose:
Uveal melanoma (UM) has a high propensity to metastasize. Prognosis is associated with specific driver mutations and copy number variations (CNVs), but limited primary tumor tissue is available for molecular characterization due to eye-sparing irradiation treatment. This study aimed to assess the rise in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels in UM and evaluate its efficacy for CNV-profiling of patients with UM.
Methods:
In a pilot study, we assessed ctDNA levels in the blood of patients with UM (n = 18) at various time points, including the time of diagnosis (n = 13), during fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) treatment (n = 6), and upon detection of metastatic disease (n = 13). Shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) combined with in silico size-selection was used to identify prognostically relevant CNVs in patients with UM (n = 26) from peripheral blood retrieved at the time of diagnosis (n = 9), during fSRT (n = 5), during post-treatment follow-up (n = 4), metastasis detection (n = 6), and metastasis follow-up (n = 4).
Results:
A total of 34 patients had blood analyzed for ctDNA detection (n = 18) and/or CNV analysis (n = 26) at various time points. At the time of diagnosis, 5 of 13 patients (38%) had detectable ctDNA (median = 0 copies/mL). Upon detection of metastatic disease, ctDNA was detected in 10 of 13 patients (77%) and showed increased ctDNA levels (median = 24 copies/mL, P < 0.01). Among the six patients analyzed during fSRT, three (50%) patients had detectable ctDNA at baseline and three of six (50%) patients had undetectable levels of ctDNA. During the fSRT regimen, ctDNA levels remained unchanged (P > 0.05). The ctDNA fractions were undetectable to low in localized disease, and sWGS did not elucidate chromosome 3 status from blood samples. However, in 7 of 10 (70%) patients with metastases, the detection of chromosome 3 loss corresponded to the high metastatic-risk class.
Conclusions:
The rise in ctDNA levels observed in patients with UM harboring metastases suggests its potential utility for CNV profiling. These findings highlight the potential of using ctDNA for metastasis detection and patient inclusion in therapeutic studies targeting metastatic UM.
