Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory

The cerebellum, while traditionally associated with motor control, also plays a crucial role in memory, particularly in procedural memory, which involves learning motor tasks that become automatic through repetition. For example, studies have shown that when the cerebellum is damaged, individuals or animals lose the ability to learn conditioned motor responses, such as the conditioned eye-blink response in classical conditioning experiments with rabbits. This study demonstrates the...

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive Learning

Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A collaborative guide to Rapid Invisible Frequency Tagging (RIFT): Methods, insights, and recommendations.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same author

AI assists adversarial collaboration in debate on minority salience.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026

Same author

Multitarget Visual Search Flexibly Switches Between Concurrent and Sequential Search Modes.

Psychological science·2026

Same author

Past and present goals are represented concurrently during visual search.

PLoS biology·2026

Same author

Inhibition of Return without Preparatory Suppression in Spatial Priority Maps.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026

Same author

Reply to Rodríguez: a temporal over nasal visual field dominance during interocular competition as a mechanism for the visual unawareness of the nose.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Action consequences guide the use of visual working memory.

Andre Sahakian¹, Surya Gayet¹, Chris L E Paffen¹

¹Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|February 8, 2024

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Action consequences impact visual working memory (VWM) usage. Higher penalties reduce errors by making people more cautious, but don't improve memory storage. VWM information is used more cautiously, not stored better, when actions have severe consequences.

More Related Videos

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects

Published on: November 30, 2018

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Visual working memory (VWM) temporarily stores visual information crucial for guiding actions.
The role of action consequences in VWM utilization is often overlooked.
Understanding how VWM adapts to varying action contexts is key to explaining its functional role.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate if the severity of action consequences influences memory encoding and utilization in VWM.
To differentiate the effects of error cost versus information accessibility on VWM performance.
To determine if VWM is used more cautiously or stored more effectively under high-stakes conditions.

Main Methods:

An online copying task was used, requiring participants to reproduce a visual display.
Manipulation of error cost (5s vs 0.5s penalty) and sampling cost (5s vs 0.5s inspection time).
Quantification of inspection instances and reproduction errors to assess VWM strategy and accuracy.

Main Results:

Increased error cost led to fewer errors but did not change the number of information inspections.
Increased sampling cost significantly reduced information inspections and increased errors.
Action consequences influenced the cautiousness of VWM information use, not the amount of information stored.

Conclusions:

Action consequences modulate the cautiousness of VWM information utilization, promoting reluctance to act on uncertain data.
Information accessibility, unlike action consequences, affects the quantity of information sampled for VWM.
VWM performance is optimized by adjusting cautiousness based on potential action outcomes, rather than enhancing memory encoding itself.