Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 4, 2025

Outer-Boundary Assisted Segmentation and Quantification of Trabecular Bones by an Imagej Plugin
Published on: March 14, 2018
Computed Tomography Volumetry of Bone Cement: Retrospective Blinded Validation of Commercially Available
Alan A Sag, Ernest Barral1, Russell E Thompson2
1Duke Cancer Institute Center for Brain and Spine Metastasis, Duke University Medical Center.
Objective:
Cement volumes are increasingly linked to orthopedic oncology and neurosurgical outcomes (construct durability, adjacent fracture), but manual cement volumetry remains time prohibitive. The authors aim to report performance of PACS-integrated volumetric software specifically for barium-enhanced polymethylmethacrylate cement.
Methods:
Institutional review board-approved single-institution retrospective review of patients from 2019-2022 undergoing kyphoplasty for pathological compression fractures with a quantitative cement infuser providing true cement volume. An operator blinded to true cement volumes retrospectively performed software-assisted volumetry on follow-up computed tomography scans.
Results:
Included were 91 kyphoplasty levels in 56 patients: mean age, 62 years (range, 34-85 years), 73% female. True cement volume (available for 44 of 66 procedures) was mean 4.5 mL per level (range, 1.2-15.6 mL). Measured cement volume (available for all procedures) yielded a mean of 6.1 mL per level (range, 1.5-27.9 mL). For the 57 levels (39 patients) where both true and measured cement volumes were available, linear regression intercept and slope were 1.46 (95% CI = 0.97-1.95, P < 0.001) and 0.52 (CI = 0.47-0.57, P < 0.001), respectively, suggesting measured volume averaged 1.46 mL greater than true volume, with each additional milliliter of measured volume corresponding to approximately 0.52 mL of true volume. There was no significant difference in the relationship between estimated and actual cement volume in thoracic levels (intercept = -0.24, CI = -1.13 to 0.66, P = 0.61; slope = 0.03, CI = -0.14 to 0.19, P = 0.73) compared with lumbar levels. The goodness-of-fit of the regression model was strong ( R2 = 0.81). Discrepancies ranged from 90% underestimation to 52% overestimation; average, 17% overestimation.
Conclusions:
Semi-automated volumetry maintained a strong correlation with true volumes across the thoracic and lumbar curvatures, overestimating cement volume by a mean of 17% or 1.46 mL.
More Related Videos
07:12Semiautomated Longitudinal Microcomputed Tomography-based Quantitative Structural Analysis of a Nude Rat Osteoporosis-related Vertebral Fracture Model
Published on: September 28, 2017
07:29Author Spotlight: Advanced Techniques for Characterizing Tissue Mineralization in Bone Regeneration Research
Published on: September 27, 2024