Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The DNA Helix01:07

The DNA Helix

20.8K
Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is the genetic material responsible for passing traits from generation to generation in all organisms and most viruses. DNA is composed of two strands of nucleotides that wind around each other to form a spring-like structure called a double helix. However, the double helix is not perfectly symmetrical. Instead, there are regularly occurring grooves in the structure. The major groove occurs where the sugar-phosphate backbones are relatively far apart. This space...
20.8K
Nucleic Acid Structure01:25

Nucleic Acid Structure

6.1K
The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group on the ribose's second carbon and a hydrogen on the deoxyribose's second carbon. The phosphate residue attaches to the hydroxyl group of the 5′ carbon of one sugar and the hydroxyl group of the 3′ carbon of the sugar of the next nucleotide, which forms  a 5′ to 3′ phosphodiester linkage.
DNA Structure
DNA...
6.1K
DNA as a Genetic Template02:05

DNA as a Genetic Template

21.9K
Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The Watson-Crick model of double-helical DNA structure, proposed in 1952, drew heavily upon the X-ray crystallography work of researchers Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins. Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their work in 1962. Franklin was, controversially, excluded from the prize for...
21.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequence-based modeling of low-affinity transcription factor-DNA binding through deep learning.

NAR genomics and bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Circumventing the synthesizability problem in generative molecular design.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Quantitative modulation of a spatial enhancer through the biophysical properties of a transcription factor binding site.

Science advances·2026
Same author

Novel fold and wing structure of Forkhead transcription factor facilitate DNA binding.

Nucleic acids research·2025
Same author

PAM-adjacent DNA flexibility tunes CRISPR-Cas12a off-target binding.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Contribution of DNA breathing to physical interactions with transcription factors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same journal

Interplay between oxygen redox and interfacial stability of Li-rich positive electrodes in sulfide-based all-solid-state batteries.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Breaking dependence on melanisation imparts diversity to a dogmatic invasion strategy of phytopathogenic fungi.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Hydroxyl-rich nanocavities on perovskite enable nearly barrierless intramolecular hydrogen transfer for nitrate electroreduction to ammonia.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Household mobility responses to weather extremes in Kyrgyzstan.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Autonomous Motion Vision with Tri-bulk-heterojunctioned Organic Adaptation Transistor.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Tissue-adhesive hydrogel optical fiber for peripheral optogenetic neuromodulation.

Nature communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.0K

Predicting DNA structure using a deep learning method.

Jinsen Li1, Tsu-Pei Chiu1, Remo Rohs2,3,4,5

  • 1Department of Quantitative and Computational Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.

Nature Communications
|February 9, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Deep DNAshape, a novel deep learning method, accurately predicts DNA shape features by considering flanking DNA sequences. This tool enhances understanding of protein-DNA binding and gene regulation.

More Related Videos

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

20.6K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 4, 2025

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data
09:34

A Virtual Machine Platform for Non-Computer Professionals for Using Deep Learning to Classify Biological Sequences of Metagenomic Data

Published on: September 25, 2021

4.0K
Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA
16:24

Analyzing and Building Nucleic Acid Structures with 3DNA

Published on: April 26, 2013

20.6K
Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells
10:34

Probing RNA Structure with Dimethyl Sulfate Mutational Profiling with Sequencing In Vitro and in Cells

Published on: December 9, 2022

4.2K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Structural Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Protein-DNA binding is crucial for gene regulation.
  • Three-dimensional DNA structure (DNA shape) significantly influences these binding mechanisms.
  • Current methods for predicting DNA shape often rely on k-mer approaches and may not fully capture the impact of flanking regions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce Deep DNAshape, a deep learning-based method for high-throughput prediction of DNA shape features.
  • To accurately account for the influence of extended flanking regions on DNA shape without extensive simulations.
  • To provide insights into how flanking regions affect protein-DNA binding mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a deep learning model, Deep DNAshape, for predicting DNA structural features.
  • The method inherently incorporates the effects of extended flanking DNA sequences.
  • Evaluated the method's ability to predict DNA shape and its impact on downstream machine learning models.

Main Results:

  • Deep DNAshape accurately predicts DNA structural features, considering extended flanking regions.
  • The method demonstrates that flanking regions quantitatively affect DNA shape readout mechanisms.
  • Incorporating Deep DNAshape features into machine learning models improved prediction accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Deep DNAshape offers a powerful, high-throughput tool for predicting DNA shape and understanding the influence of flanking sequences.
  • The findings provide valuable insights into the detailed structural readout mechanisms of protein-DNA binding.
  • This method can be broadly applied to various DNA structure-related studies in genomics and bioinformatics.