Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Data Validation01:15

Data Validation

162
Method validation is a crucial process in analytical chemistry designed to confirm that a given method consistently produces reliable and high-quality results. This process is essential when a method is applied to different sample matrices or when procedural modifications are made, ensuring that the results meet acceptable standards across various applications.
Key parameters for method validation include:
162
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.6K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Self-adaptive forward-forward network for anomaly detection and medical image analysis.

Frontiers in radiology·2026
Same author

Disparate privacy risks from medical AI.

Nature·2026
Same author

Longitudinal analysis of CYFRA 21-1 levels in patients with pulmonary nodules: Differential trajectories between benign and malignant cases.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Charting Cervical Spinal Cord Morphometry Across the Lifespan.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Missing infrastructure for real-world predictive AI impact.

BMJ health & care informatics·2026
Same author

Regulating digital surgery to balance safety and innovation: a SAGES white paper.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

RNAbpFlow: base pair-augmented SE(3) flow matching for conditional RNA 3D structure generation.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Spatio-DARLIN enables robust and efficient in situ lineage tracing in mice at single-cell resolution.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

EasyGrid: a versatile platform for automated cryo-EM sample preparation and quality control.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Cloud-based microscope enables live neuroimaging for 24 h and beyond with worldwide access.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

Deep molecular profiling in three dimensions.

Nature methods·2026
Same journal

3D pathology-guided microdissection.

Nature methods·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

47.1K

Understanding metric-related pitfalls in image analysis validation.

Annika Reinke1,2,3, Minu D Tizabi4,5, Michael Baumgartner6

  • 1German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg, Division of Intelligent Medical Systems, Heidelberg, Germany. a.reinke@dkfz-heidelberg.de.

Nature Methods
|February 12, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Choosing appropriate validation metrics is crucial for scientific progress, especially in AI image analysis. This study identifies common pitfalls in metric selection to improve reliability and accessibility of information for researchers.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Shape and Size of Activated Sludge Particles Immobilized in Agar with an Open Source Software Pipeline
09:27

Measuring the Shape and Size of Activated Sludge Particles Immobilized in Agar with an Open Source Software Pipeline

Published on: January 30, 2019

7.1K
Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ
08:44

Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ

Published on: June 5, 2018

67.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins
11:01

Automated Quantification and Analysis of Cell Counting Procedures Using ImageJ Plugins

Published on: November 17, 2016

47.1K
Measuring the Shape and Size of Activated Sludge Particles Immobilized in Agar with an Open Source Software Pipeline
09:27

Measuring the Shape and Size of Activated Sludge Particles Immobilized in Agar with an Open Source Software Pipeline

Published on: January 30, 2019

7.1K
Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ
08:44

Quantifying Microglia Morphology from Photomicrographs of Immunohistochemistry Prepared Tissue Using ImageJ

Published on: June 5, 2018

67.7K

Area of Science:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Biomedical image analysis
  • Scientific validation

Background:

  • Validation metrics are critical for scientific progress and AI translation.
  • Inadequate metric selection, particularly in image analysis, is a growing concern.
  • Existing knowledge on validation metric limitations is fragmented and difficult to access.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a centralized, reliable resource on pitfalls in validation metrics for image analysis.
  • To enhance understanding and improve the selection of validation metrics in scientific research.
  • To address the gap between AI research and its practical application through better validation.

Main Methods:

  • A multistage Delphi process involving a multidisciplinary expert consortium.
  • Extensive community feedback incorporated to refine findings.
  • Development of a domain-agnostic taxonomy for categorizing pitfalls.

Main Results:

  • Identification and categorization of common pitfalls in validation metrics for image analysis.
  • Creation of a comprehensive resource for researchers.
  • Generalizable pitfalls across various application domains, not limited to biomedical imaging.

Conclusions:

  • Improved comprehension of validation metric pitfalls enhances scientific rigor.
  • Accessible, reliable information on metric selection is vital for AI translation.
  • Standardized understanding of validation is key for advancing image analysis research.