Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 7, 2026

Multiplex Detection of Bacteria in Complex Clinical and Environmental Samples using Oligonucleotide-coupled Fluorescent Microspheres
Published on: October 23, 2011
A Comparison of Newer and Traditional Approaches to Diagnosing Vaginal Infections
Anna Powell1, Oluwatosin Goje, Paul Nyirjesy
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; the Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract:
Molecular diagnostic testing (eg, polymerase chain reaction [PCR]-based vaginitis testing) is widely used in clinical practice, although vaginitis experts have reservations about its use for vaginitis diagnosis. As with any new technology, cost to the health system is a large concern. Although clinical evaluation of signs and symptoms along with wet mount microscopy is traditionally used for vaginitis diagnosis, it is less accurate compared with molecular diagnostic testing. Here we review the benefits of adopting newer molecular diagnostics into routine gynecologic practice with some guidance from vaginitis experts that favor both traditional and more modern approaches. We argue that instead of trying to resist the oncoming tide of molecular diagnostics, we can embrace them and put them to appropriate use to effect rapid, accurate, and more flexible diagnosis of vaginitis conditions for our patients.
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection I: Introduction
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urine Studies II: Urine Culture and Sensitivity Test
Methods of Classification and Identification
Automated Microbial Diagnostics
Trichomoniasis

