Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Virtual Hand with Ambiguous Movement between the Self and Other Origin: Sense of Ownership and 'Other-Produced' Agency
Published on: October 28, 2020
Critical Psychology and the Brain: Rethinking Free will in the Legal Context
1OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat, Haryana, India. sinchetan@gmail.com.
This study explores the debate on brain determinism versus free will in law. It suggests that while free will may be a
Area of Science:
- Critical Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Legal Studies
Background:
- The legal domain is increasingly influenced by neuroscience, prompting a re-evaluation of concepts like free will and determinism.
- Cultural and contextual factors shape the expression and understanding of free will, impacting its role in public and private life.
- Existing legal frameworks often treat free will as a conscious choice, distinct from philosophical notions of it being a 'necessary illusion'.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically examine the debate surrounding brain determinism and free will within the legal context.
- To explore the sociocultural implications of neuroscience on the concept of legal responsibility.
- To analyze how the criminal justice system currently operationalizes the concept of free will.
Main Methods:
- Critical analysis of existing literature from psychology, neuroscience, and legal theory.
- Philosophical inquiry into the nature of free will and its societal implications.
- Examination of the intersection between neuroscientific findings and legal doctrines of responsibility.
Main Results:
- Neuroscience offers a more holistic, sociocultural understanding of responsibility, challenging simplistic deterministic views.
- Free will can be conceptualized as a 'necessary illusion' for moral and social functioning, yet the legal system treats it as conscious agency.
- Criminal acts are viewed as social phenomena, underscoring that the brain's function is inseparable from collective will and societal context.
Conclusions:
- The integration of neuroscience necessitates a nuanced understanding of free will in law, acknowledging both its illusory and practical aspects.
- Legal responsibility must consider the sociocultural context and collective will, moving beyond purely individualistic or deterministic models.
- Future legal frameworks may need to reconcile neuroscientific insights with societal needs for accountability and moral order.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
07:43Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
Published on: August 4, 2023
Related Concept Videos
The Behavioral Perspective on Personality
Reason and Intuition
Humanistic Psychology
This approach...
Freud's Psychoanalytic Theory
Freud's concept of psychic determinism asserts...
Defining Psychology
Freudian Psychology