Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

Preparation and Friction Force Microscopy Measurements of Immiscible, Opposing Polymer Brushes
Published on: December 24, 2014
Pressure Anisotropy in Polymer Brushes and Its Effects on Wetting
Lars B Veldscholte1, Jacco H Snoeijer2, Wouter K den Otter3
1Functional Polymer Surfaces, Department of Molecules and Materials, MESA+ Institute, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands.
Polymer brushes exhibit lateral pressure, but this does not affect their wettability. The difference in interfacial tension between wet and dry brushes accurately describes brush wetting behavior.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Surface Chemistry
- Computational Chemistry
Background:
- Polymer brushes, dense macromolecule coatings, possess inherent lateral compressive pressure due to chain elasticity and excluded volume interactions.
- This pressure complicates defining interfacial properties and understanding brush wettability.
- The relationship between brush interfacial tension and wetting behavior requires clarification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between grafting-induced lateral pressure in polymer brushes, interfacial tension, and wettability.
- To analyze how lateral pressure influences the wetting behavior of polymer brushes.
- To clarify the role of interfacial tension in brush wettability.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations.
- Focusing on systems with grafting densities and polymer-liquid affinities preventing mixing.
- Analyzing the influence of grafting density on liquid contact angle and interfacial tension.
Main Results:
- The liquid contact angle of polymer brushes is independent of grafting density, indicating lateral pressure does not influence wettability.
- The difference in interfacial tension between wet and dry brushes is well-defined and accurately describes wettability via Young's law.
- A method was developed to isolate grafting-induced pressure, successfully disentangling interfacial and grafting effects except near the mixing point.
Conclusions:
- Grafting-induced lateral compressive pressure in polymer brushes does not directly impact their wettability.
- The difference in interfacial tension between wet and dry states provides an accurate measure of brush wettability.
- Interfacial and grafting effects can be effectively separated, offering insights into brush behavior, particularly concerning autophobic dewetting near mixing points.
Related Concept Videos
Polymer Classification: Stereospecificity
Polymer Classification: Architecture
Polymer Classification: Crystallinity
Crystalline domains are the regions where polymer chains are aligned in an orderly manner and held together in proximity by intermolecular forces. For example, chains in the crystalline domains of polyethylene and nylon are bound together by van der Waals...
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...

