Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 3, 2025

A Protocol for Measuring Cue Reactivity in a Rat Model of Cocaine Use Disorder
Published on: June 18, 2018
The Corbett Targeted Coin Test: Reliability, criterion related validity, and normative data
Kimatha O Grice1, Gustavo J Almeida2
1Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Study Design:
Clinical measurement.
Background:
Many daily living tasks require in-hand manipulation (IHM). There is a gap in standardized assessment tools for measuring IHM. The Corbett Targeted Coin Test (CTCT) was designed to allow measurement of that fine motor skill.
Purpose:
1) To evaluate the interrater, test-retest reliability, and validity of the CTCT, and 2) to establish adult norms for the CTCT.
Methods:
Reliability and Validity - 30 participants (25 females, age range 21-45) were assessed with the Nine-Hole Peg test and CTCT consecutively by three researchers, then re-evaluated one week later on the CTCT; Reliability was determined using intraclass correlation (ICC2,k) between tests and across testers; Criterion-related validity was determined by comparing scores from nine-hole test and CTCT across testers using ICC2,k. Normative - 190 participants (147 females, age range 20-80) were assessed with the CTCT; mean and standard deviation for participants' scores were calculated by age groups and gender.
Results:
Test-retest reliability: poor for the right hand (ICCs = -0.29 to 0.45), and poor-moderate for the left hand (ICCs = 0.17-0.56). Inter-rater reliability ranged from moderate to excellent (ICCs = 0.60-0.80). The agreement between CTCT scores and Nine-Hole Peg test was poor for the right (ICC = 0.02; 95% CI: [-0.06, 0.14]) and left hands (ICC = 0.06; 95% CI: [-0.08, 0.28]). CTCT normative data: 41-50 age group demonstrated the highest performance while the 71-80 age group demonstrated the lowest performance. Scores between genders were similar.
Discussion:
The poor test-retest reliability of CTCT was probably due to practice effect, while interrater reliability indicated that the test can be administered by different testers without compromising the results. The poor validity between tools proves their different constructs.
Conclusions:
Use of the CTCT may add another dimension to assessment of dexterity and fine motor skills, specifically, in-hand manipulation, but needs further research on test-retest reliability.
More Related Videos
09:00Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
Published on: August 16, 2024
12:08The Use of Traditional Fear Tests to Evaluate Different Emotional Circuits in Cattle
Published on: April 22, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Cochran's Q Test
Spearman's Rank Correlation Test
Spearman's test calculates...
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity,...
Correlations
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test