Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Paramyxoviruses for Tumor-targeted Immunomodulation: Design and Evaluation Ex Vivo
Published on: January 7, 2019
A Novel Risk Stratification-Based Immunomodulatory Treatment Strategy for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada Disease
Kehan Jin1, Anyi Liang2, Hang Song1
1From the Department of Ophthalmology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (K.J., H.S., F.X., F.G., X.H., M.Z., C.Z.), Beijing; Key Laboratory of Ocular Fundus Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (K.J., H.S., F.X., F.G., X.H., M.Z., C.Z.), Beijing.
Purpose:
To develop a more tailored immunomodulatory treatment (IMT) strategy based on a novel 2-arm risk stratification system in Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) patients.
Design:
A retrospective clinical cohort study.
Methods:
Seventy-nine VKH patients in the acute stage were stratified into low- (n = 58) and high-risk (n = 21) groups based on their exposure to risk factors. They were treated with oral glucocorticoids (GCs) plus as-needed (PRN) or first-line IMT. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), sunset glow fundus (SGF) occurrence, relapse rate, and systemic adverse events were evaluated during follow-up.
Results:
Compared with the low-risk group, the high-risk group showed poorer BCVA at baseline (estimated difference 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.78; P < .001) and 6-month follow-up (estimated difference 0.08, 95% CI 0.00-0.08; P = .006), higher incidence of SGF at 12 months (52% vs 28%; RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4; P = .040), and higher relapse rate at 6 months (24% vs 5%; RR 4.6, 95% CI 1.2-17.5; P = .028) and 12 months (52% vs 12%; RR 4.4, 95% CI 1.9-9.7; P < .001). In the low-risk cohort, no significant difference between the 2 IMT strategies was observed in primary outcomes. In the high-risk cohort, patients with the immediate IMT showed better BCVA (estimated difference -0.20, 95% CI -0.3 to -0.08; P = .007), lower incidence of SGF (27% vs 80%; RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9; P = .030), and lower relapse rate (27% vs 80%; RR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9; P = .030) compared with the PRN regimen. Moreover, the immediate IMT regimen had a higher frequency of systemic adverse events than the PRN regimen (47% vs 7%; RR 7.1, 95% CI 2.5-20.4; P < .001).
Conclusions:
High-risk stratification at baseline was associated with poor prognosis. The immediate IMT regimen was only beneficial for high-risk VKH patients regarding visual outcome, SGF, and relapse rate. This study suggests a potential need for a customized IMT strategy for VKH patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Tumor Immunotherapy
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents

