Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 11, 2026

Coronary Progenitor Cells and Soluble Biomarkers in Cardiovascular Prognosis after Coronary Angioplasty
Published on: January 28, 2020
Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction in high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions
Vasileios F Panoulas1, Javier Escaned2, Jonathan M Hill3
1Department of Cardiology, Harefield Hospital, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Insights
High-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with Impella support improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 90 days. Complete revascularization and higher baseline LVEF also predicted better LVEF outcomes post-PCI.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Complete revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is crucial for long-term outcomes.
- Mechanical circulatory support, such as Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), is utilized in high-risk PCI (HR-PCI) to improve safety and revascularization completeness.
- The impact of revascularization completeness on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) following HR-PCI with mechanical support is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate predictors of LVEF at 90 days post-HR-PCI using Impella or IABP.
- To explore the relationship between revascularization completeness (residual SYNTAX Score) and LVEF improvement in HR-PCI patients.
Main Methods:
- Individual patient data from PROTECT II and RESTORE-EF trials were analyzed.
- Linear regression models were employed to identify predictors of 90-day LVEF, including treatment group, baseline characteristics, and post-PCI residual SYNTAX Score (rSS).
- Stepwise selection based on Akaike Information Criterion was used for model refinement.
Main Results:
- Impella treatment and higher baseline LVEF were significant predictors of LVEF improvement at 90 days (p ≤ 0.05).
- Lower rSS (indicating more complete revascularization) showed a trend towards predicting improved LVEF (p = 0.082 in base case, p ≤ 0.05 in sensitivity analysis).
- Higher pre-PCI SYNTAX Score (SS) also contributed to predicting improved LVEF in the sensitivity analysis.
Conclusions:
- Higher baseline LVEF, complete revascularization (lower rSS), and Impella treatment predict improved post-PCI LVEF.
- Impella may enhance revascularization extent and quality, alongside providing intraprocedural ventricular unloading.
- These findings highlight the benefits of Impella in improving cardiac function post-HR-PCI.
Abstract:
Revascularization completeness after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with improved long-term outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support [intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or Impella] is used during high-risk PCI (HR-PCI) to enhance peri-procedural safety and achieve more complete revascularization. The relationship between revascularization completeness [post-PCI residual SYNTAX Score (rSS)] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in HR-PCI has not been established. We investigated LVEF predictors at 90 days post-PCI with Impella or IABP support. Individual patient data (IPD) were analyzed from PROTECT II (NCT00562016) in the base case. IPD from PROTECT II and RESTORE-EF (NCT04648306) were naïvely pooled in the sensitivity analysis. Using complete cases only, linear regression was used to explore the predictors of LVEF at 90 days post-PCI. Models were refined using stepwise selection based on Akaike Information Criterion and included: treatment group (Impella, IABP), baseline characteristics [age, gender, race, New York Heart Association Functional Classification, LVEF, SYNTAX Score (SS)], and rSS. Impella treatment and higher baseline LVEF were significant predictors of LVEF improvement at 90 days post-PCI (p ≤ 0.05), and a lower rSS contributed to the model (p = 0.082). In the sensitivity analysis, Impella treatment, higher baseline LVEF, and lower rSS were significant predictors of LVEF improvement at 90 days (p ≤ 0.05), and SS pre-PCI contributed to the model (p = 0.070). Higher baseline LVEF, higher SS pre-PCI, lower rSS (i.e. completeness of revascularization), and Impella treatment were predictors of post-PCI LVEF improvement. The findings suggest potential mechanisms of Impella include improving the extent and quality of revascularization, and intraprocedural ventricular unloading.
More Related Videos
07:25Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies