Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Diffusion-Weighted MRI-Based Virtual Elastography and Shear-Wave Elastography for the Assessment of Breast Lesions
Kun Sun1, Ying Zhu2, Weimin Chai1
1Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-based virtual MR elastography (DWI-vMRE) in the assessment of breast lesions is still in the research stage.
Purpose:
To investigate the usefulness of elasticity values on DWI-vMRE in the evaluation of breast lesions, and the correlation with the values calculated from shear-wave elastography (SWE).
Study Type:
Prospective.
Population/Subjects:
153 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 55 ± 12 years) with 153 pathological confirmed breast lesions (24 benign and 129 malignant lesions).
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5-T MRI, multi-b readout segmented echo planar imaging (b-values of 0, 200, 800, and 1000 sec/mm2).
Assessment:
For DWI-vMRE assessment, lesions were manually segmented using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC0-1000) map, then the region of interests were copied to the map of shifted-ADC (sADC200-800, sADC 200-1500). For SWE assessment, the shear modulus of the lesions was measured by US elastic modulus (μUSE). Intraclass/interclass kappa coefficients were calculated to measure the consistency.
Statistical Tests:
Pearson's correlation was used to assess the relationship between sADC and μUSE. A receiver operating characteristic analysis with the area under the curve (AUC) was performed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between benign and malignant breast lesions of sADC and μUSE. A P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
There were significant differences between benign and malignant breast lesions of μUSE (24.17 ± 10.64 vs. 37.20 ± 12.61), sADC200-800 (1.38 ± 0.31 vs. 0.97 ± 0.18 × 10-3 mm2/sec), and sADC200-1500 (1.14 ± 0.30 vs. 0.78 ± 0.13 × 10-3 mm2/sec). In all breast lesions, a moderate but significant correlation was observed between μUSE and sADC200-800/sADC200-1500 (r = -0.49/-0.44). AUC values to differentiate benign from malignant lesions were as follows: μUSE, 0.78; sADC200-800, 0.89; sADC200-1500, 0.89.
Data Conclusions:
Both SWE and DWI-vMRE could be used for the differentiation of benign versus malignant breast lesions. Furthermore, DWI-vMRE with the use of sADC show relatively higher AUC values than SWE.
Level Of Evidence:
4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
More Related Videos
12:18Magnetic Resonance Elastography Methodology for the Evaluation of Tissue Engineered Construct Growth
Published on: February 9, 2012
07:57Viscoelastic Characterization of Soft Tissue-Mimicking Gelatin Phantoms using Indentation and Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: May 10, 2022