Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Eyewitness Memory01:22

Eyewitness Memory

110
Eyewitness memory refers to the recollection of events by someone who has directly witnessed them, often serving as critical evidence in legal settings. This type of memory is commonly used in criminal cases where a witness describes details like a suspect's appearance, clothing, or behavior during a crime. However, despite its perceived reliability, eyewitness memory is prone to significant errors.
One such error is memory distortion, which occurs because human memory does not function...
110
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.6K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.6K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

5.7K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
5.7K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

6.2K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
6.2K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

4.1K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
4.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing the impacts of a drug testing error in a correctional setting.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same author

Safety and immunogenicity of concomitant quadrivalent meningococcus ACYW-TT and meningococcus group B vaccines.

NPJ vaccines·2026
Same author

Arti-'fickle' intelligence: using LLMs as a tool for inference in the political and social sciences.

Nature computational science·2025
Same author

Testing theories of political persuasion using AI.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Reversibly Softening and Stiffening Organogels Using a Wavelength-Controlled Disulfide-Diselenide Exchange.

ACS macro letters·2022
Same author

A Natural Experiment to Test the Effect of Sanction Certainty and Celerity on Substance-Impaired Driving: North Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Program.

Journal of quantitative criminology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K

Assessing Verbal Eyewitness Confidence Statements Using Natural Language Processing.

Rachel Leigh Greenspan1, Alex Lyman2, Paul Heaton2

  • 1Department of Criminal Justice and Legal Studies, University of Mississippi.

Psychological Science
|February 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers developed an automated model using natural language processing to classify verbal eyewitness confidence. This model accurately predicts eyewitness accuracy, offering new insights for legal and scientific applications.

Keywords:
eyewitness confidencenatural language processingverbal confidence

More Related Videos

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

451

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

1.5K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.2K
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

451

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Computer Science

Background:

  • Eyewitness confidence is crucial in legal investigations.
  • Traditionally, confidence is measured numerically in labs, but verbally in the field.
  • Existing methods for analyzing verbal confidence are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an automated model for classifying verbal eyewitness confidence statements.
  • To assess the model's accuracy in predicting eyewitness confidence levels (high, medium, low).
  • To introduce a new metric, confidence entropy, for measuring statement vagueness.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a natural language-processing approach.
  • Trained and validated a classification model on verbal confidence statements from 4,541 adult witnesses.
  • Employed confidence-accuracy calibration curves to compare model performance with self-reported numeric confidence.

Main Results:

  • The automated model achieved 71% accuracy in classifying eyewitness confidence levels.
  • The model's confidence classification effectively predicted eyewitness accuracy, comparable to self-reported numeric confidence.
  • Introduced 'confidence entropy' as a novel metric providing independent information on eyewitness accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Automated analysis of verbal eyewitness confidence is feasible and accurate.
  • The model offers a valuable tool for empirical scientists and law enforcement in interpreting eyewitness accounts.
  • Confidence entropy provides a new, objective measure of witness certainty and its relation to accuracy.