Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
Published on: August 20, 2010
Assessing the impacts of a drug testing error in a correctional setting
Paul Heaton1, Haley A Sturges1
1Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, United States.
A reagent error in opiate urinalysis tests in California prisons led to an estimated 4490-5839 excess positive results. This impacts substance use treatment and parole decisions, highlighting the need for better quality control.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Toxicology
- Public Health in Correctional Settings
- Substance Use Disorder Treatment
Background:
- Urinalysis screening is crucial for substance use treatment in carceral settings.
- Test results can influence both clinical treatment and parole decisions.
- A reported reagent error in opiate testing within California prisons necessitates investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the scale and distribution of a reagent error in opiate urinalysis testing.
- To assess the impact of this error on Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) programs in California prisons.
- To understand the potential consequences for parole suitability determinations.
Main Methods:
- Utilized administrative datasets from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR).
- Applied statistical methods including differences-in-differences (DD), interrupted time-series analysis, and structural break tests.
- Analyzed monthly aggregated and individual-level opiate urinalysis test data from April to July 2024.
Main Results:
- Estimated excess positive opiate tests due to the error ranged from 4490 to 5839.
- A median estimate of 5425 excess positive results was identified.
- Facility-specific increases in positive test rates ranged from approximately 2 to over 16 percentage points above baseline.
Conclusions:
- The reagent error significantly inflated positive opiate test results in California correctional facilities.
- Findings emphasize the critical need for enhanced quality control and confirmatory testing in correctional urinalysis.
- Remedial reviews of parole actions affected by potentially erroneous results may be necessary.
More Related Videos
10:17High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...