Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Novel Apparatus and Method for Drug Reinforcement
Published on: August 20, 2010
Assessing the impacts of a drug testing error in a correctional setting
Paul Heaton1, Haley A Sturges1
1Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, United States.
Abstract:
Urinalysis screening tests are a component of substance use treatment programs in carceral settings. Although results of these tests are meant to be used by physicians to guide treatment, they may also influence parole suitability determinations. Utilizing administrative datasets from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), the present analysis quantifies the scale and institutional distribution of a reported reagent error in opiate urinalysis testing in California prisons' Medication-Assisted Treatment (MAT) program from April to July 2024. Statistical methods including differences-in-differences (DD), interrupted time-series analysis, and structural break tests were applied to monthly aggregated and individual-level test data. Estimated excess positive opiate tests ranged from 4490 to 5839, with a median estimate of 5425. Facility-specific increases ranged from approximately 2 to over 16 percentage points above baseline rates. Given the potential impact of a positive urinalysis screening test result on incarcerated individuals' parole outcomes, these findings underscore the need for improved quality controls and confirmatory testing in correctional settings. Additionally, remedial reviews of parole actions influenced by potentially erroneous results may be warranted.
More Related Videos
10:17High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
08:05A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...
Drug Regulation
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...