Impact of Potential Case Misclassification by Administrative Diagnostic Codes on Outcome Assessment of Observational

David Goodman-Meza1,2,3, Michihiko Goto4,5, Anabel Salimian1

  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) improve survival for people who inject drugs (PWID) hospitalized with infections. Natural language processing (NLP) identified this benefit, unlike ICD codes which showed no significant effect.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Medicine
  • Public Health
  • Infectious Diseases

Background:

  • Initiating medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during hospitalization may improve outcomes for people who inject drugs (PWID) with infections.
  • Previous studies often used International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes to identify PWID, but these codes can be inaccurate due to misclassification.
  • This misclassification may bias analyses of MOUD effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of misclassification bias from ICD codes on the analysis of MOUD outcomes in hospitalized PWID.
  • To compare the effectiveness of MOUD on 365-day mortality using different methods for identifying PWID.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 36,868 patients with *Staphylococcus aureus* bacteremia from 2003-2014 in Veterans Affairs hospitals was analyzed.
  • Two algorithms were used to identify PWID: an ICD code-based algorithm and a natural language processing (NLP) algorithm analyzing admission notes.
  • Mixed-effects Cox regression models assessed the association between inpatient MOUD receipt and 365-day all-cause mortality.

Main Results:

  • NLP identified 2,389 PWID, while ICD codes identified 6,804 PWID.
  • In the NLP-identified cohort, inpatient MOUD was associated with a significant protective effect on 365-day survival (aHR, 0.48; P < .01).
  • No significant effect of MOUD on survival was found in the ICD code-identified cohort (aHR, 1.00; P = .99).

Conclusions:

  • MOUD demonstrated a protective effect against all-cause mortality when PWID were identified using NLP.
  • The protective effect of MOUD was not significant when PWID were identified using ICD codes, highlighting potential bias.
  • Accurate identification of PWID is crucial for evaluating the effectiveness of MOUD in improving patient outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis01:10

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
126
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
100
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
169
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
268
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model01:15

Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model

The case management model is a multidisciplinary approach that involves healthcare professionals from diverse disciplines, such as physicians, nurses, therapists, social workers, and pharmacists, working collaboratively to address the various needs of patients. Each healthcare professional brings unique expertise and perspectives, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's condition and tailoring treatment plans accordingly.
For example, a patient with a chronic...
573