Intention offloading: Domain-general versus task-specific confidence signals
Chhavi Sachdeva1,2, Sam J Gilbert3
1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK. chhavi.sachdeva@unidistance.ch.
External reminders, or intention offloading, are influenced by confidence. Individual confidence in perceptual tasks predicts reminder setting, but not optimal strategy use, highlighting metacognitive influences.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Metacognition
- Decision Making
Background:
- Intention offloading involves using external reminders for future intentions, like medication alerts.
- Metacognition, particularly confidence, influences intention offloading decisions, independent of cognitive ability.
- The cross-domain organization of metacognitive influences on intention offloading requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the relationship between perceptual confidence and intention offloading across different cognitive domains.
- To investigate whether individual differences in confidence predict both the likelihood and strategy of intention offloading.
- To determine if metacognitive signals influencing offloading are domain-general or task-specific.
Main Methods:
- Participants completed perceptual discrimination tasks with accuracy standardized using a staircase procedure.
- Two measures of intention offloading were assessed in a subsequent memory task: reminder setting likelihood and bias.
- Objective accuracy and confidence judgments were recorded during perceptual tasks.
Main Results:
- Perceptual confidence positively correlated with the overall likelihood of setting reminders.
- Perceptual confidence did not correlate with the bias in reminder-setting strategy.
- Individual differences in confidence reflected objective ability, even after performance equalization via staircasing.
Conclusions:
- Intention offloading is shaped by both general and specific metacognitive signals.
- Confidence differences reflect objective ability, complicating their use as a pure measure of metacognitive bias.
- Metacognitive influences on intention offloading are complex and domain-dependent.
More Related Videos
10:09Transferring Cognitive Tasks Between Brain Imaging Modalities: Implications for Task Design and Results Interpretation in fMRI Studies
Published on: September 22, 2014
08:05Measuring Statistical Learning Across Modalities and Domains in School-Aged Children Via an Online Platform and Neuroimaging Techniques
Published on: June 30, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Confidence Coefficient
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
Confirmation Biases
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
