Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025
Colorectal Cancer Cell Surface Protein Profiling Using an Antibody Microarray and Fluorescence Multiplexing
Published on: September 25, 2011
A proteomic classifier panel for early screening of colorectal cancer: a case control study
Hanju Hua1, Tingting Wang2, Liangxuan Pan2
1Department of Colorectal Surgery (H.H), and Department of Gastroenterology (C.Y. and Z.S.), College of Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Background:
Diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) during early stages can greatly improve patient outcome. Although technical advances in the field of genomics and proteomics have identified a number of candidate biomarkers for non-invasive screening and diagnosis, developing more sensitive and specific methods with improved cost-effectiveness and patient compliance has tremendous potential to help combat the disease.
Methods:
We enrolled three cohorts of 479 subjects, including 226 CRC cases, 197 healthy controls, and 56 advanced precancerous lesions (APC). In the discovery cohort, we used quantitative mass spectrometry to measure the expression profile of plasma proteins and applied machine-learning to select candidate proteins. We then developed a targeted mass spectrometry assay to measure plasma concentrations of seven proteins and a logistic regression classifier to distinguish CRC from healthy subjects. The classifier was further validated using two independent cohorts.
Results:
The seven-protein panel consisted of leucine rich alpha-2-glycoprotein 1 (LRG1), complement C9 (C9), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), carnosine dipeptidase 1 (CNDP1), inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain 3 (ITIH3), serpin family A member 1 (SERPINA1), and alpha-1-acid glycoprotein 1 (ORM1). The panel classified CRC and healthy subjects with high accuracy, since the area under curve (AUC) of the training and testing cohort reached 0.954 and 0.958. The AUC of the two independent validation cohorts was 0.905 and 0.909. In one validation cohort, the panel had an overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 89.9%, 81.8%, 89.2%, and 82.9%, respectively. In another blinded validation cohort, the panel classified CRC from healthy subjects with a sensitivity of 81.5%, specificity of 97.9%, and overall accuracy of 92.0%. Finally, the panel was able to detect APC with a sensitivity of 49%.
Conclusions:
This seven-protein classifier is a clear improvement compared to previously published blood-based protein biomarkers for detecting early-stage CRC, and is of translational potential to develop into a clinically useful assay.
