Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

196
Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures...
196
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.2K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Unequal Sample Sizes

5.8K
One-way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples of unequal sizes. However, calculations get complicated when sample sizes are not always the same. So, while performing ANOVA with unequal samples size, the following equation is used:
5.8K
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

2.6K
The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the...
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same author

A Note on Ising Network Analysis with Missing Data.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same author

Maximum Softly Penalized Likelihood in Factor Analysis.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same author

Combining Propensity Scores and Common Items for Test Score Equating.

Applied psychological measurementĀ·2025
Same author

Unfolding the Network of Peer Grades: A Latent Variable Approach.

PsychometrikaĀ·2025
Same author

Exact Exploratory Bi-factor Analysis: A Constraint-Based Optimization Approach.

PsychometrikaĀ·2025
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
Same journal

On dimensional implication graphs.

PsychometrikaĀ·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K

DIF Analysis with Unknown Groups and Anchor Items.

Gabriel Wallin1, Yunxiao Chen2, Irini Moustaki3

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, UmeĆ„, Sweden.

Psychometrika
|February 22, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new statistical method for Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis when neither subgroup nor anchor items are known. The approach uses latent classes and L1-regularization to identify fairness issues in tests and surveys.

Keywords:
differential item functioninglassolatent DIFlatent class analysismeasurement invariance

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

6.9K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Educational Measurement
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Ensuring fairness in survey questionnaires and educational tests is vital.
  • Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis assesses item-level measurement invariance by detecting subgroup response differences.
  • Traditional DIF methods require predefined reference/focal groups and anchor items, which are not always available.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel statistical framework for DIF analysis when both comparison groups and anchor items are unknown.
  • To develop a method that simultaneously identifies latent subgroups and DIF items without prior information.
  • To provide a robust approach for enhancing fairness in assessments.

Main Methods:

  • A general statistical framework is proposed, modeling unknown groups via latent classes.
  • Item-specific DIF parameters are introduced to capture differential item functioning.
  • An L1-regularized estimator is employed to simultaneously identify latent classes and DIF items, assuming a small number of DIF items.
  • A computationally efficient Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm is developed for the non-smooth optimization problem.

Main Results:

  • The proposed L1-regularized method effectively identifies latent classes (unknown groups) and DIF items simultaneously.
  • Simulation studies demonstrate the method's performance in various scenarios.
  • The approach was successfully applied to real-world educational test data, validating its practical utility.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework offers a powerful solution for DIF analysis in the challenging setting where both group and anchor item information is missing.
  • This method advances the assessment of measurement invariance and fairness in educational and psychological testing.
  • The findings contribute to more equitable and reliable measurement instruments.