Left ventricular ejection fraction: clinical, pathophysiological, and technical limitations

Federico Vancheri1, Giovanni Longo2, Michael Y Henein3

  • 1Department of Internal Medicine, S.Elia Hospital, Caltanissetta, Italy.

PubMed

Insights

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is widely used but has limitations in assessing heart function. This review explores LVEF

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Echocardiography
  • Cardiovascular Physiology

Background:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a cornerstone in cardiovascular guidelines for risk stratification and treatment decisions in heart failure (HF).
  • Current guidelines rely heavily on LVEF for critical choices like valve replacement timing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection.
  • However, LVEF is a global measure affected by loading conditions, geometry, and image quality, leading to significant variability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze the clinical, pathophysiological, and technical limitations of LVEF in cardiovascular disease.
  • To highlight how LVEF may not accurately reflect myocardial contractile function despite its widespread use.
  • To discuss the implications of LVEF variability and limitations in guiding patient management.

Main Methods:

  • This review synthesizes existing literature on LVEF.
  • It examines the pathophysiological basis of LVEF measurement and its determinants.
  • Clinical and technical factors influencing LVEF accuracy are analyzed.

Main Results:

  • LVEF reflects global cavity volume changes, not direct myocardial contractility, and can be normal even with impaired myofibril function.
  • Subtle myocardial ischemia may be masked by compensatory mechanisms of other myocardial fiber layers, preserving LVEF.
  • The dynamic nature of heart failure and interventional outcomes can alter LVEF, impacting its reliability for treatment guidance.

Conclusions:

  • LVEF possesses inherent limitations that challenge its role as a sole determinant for critical cardiovascular decisions.
  • Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate patient assessment and effective therapeutic strategies in cardiovascular pathologies.
  • Alternative or complementary methods may be needed to better assess systolic function and guide management in complex cardiovascular conditions.