Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
How well do one-electron self-interaction-correction methods perform for systems with fractional electrons?
Rajendra R Zope1, Yoh Yamamoto1, Tunna Baruah1
1Department of Physics, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA.
The locally scaled self-interaction correction (LSIC) method shows improved accuracy over the Perdew-Zunger self-interaction correction (PZSIC) method in addressing delocalization errors in electronic structure calculations. Both methods reduce errors, but LSIC offers superior performance in several key areas.
Area of Science:
- Quantum Chemistry
- Computational Materials Science
- Electronic Structure Theory
Background:
- Self-interaction error is a significant problem in density functional theory (DFT) approximations.
- The Perdew-Zunger self-interaction correction (PZSIC) method attempts to correct this error but exhibits paradoxical behavior.
- The locally scaled self-interaction correction (LSIC) is a newer, one-electron SIC method designed to improve upon PZSIC.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of the LSIC method in mitigating delocalization errors.
- To compare the accuracy of LSIC against PZSIC for various electronic structure problems.
- To assess the ability of LSIC to describe molecular dissociation and fractional charges.
Main Methods:
- The study employed the LSIC method with a ratio of kinetic energy densities (zσ) as an iso-orbital indicator.
- Calculations were performed for molecular dissociation (H2+, He2+, LiF) and vertical ionization energies.
- The linearity of energy versus electron number curves for fractional charges was analyzed.
Main Results:
- Both LSIC and PZSIC accurately describe the dissociation of H2+ and He2+, with LSIC showing higher overall accuracy.
- Neither LSIC nor PZSIC exhibited delocalization errors for the vertical ionization energy of isolated He atoms.
- Both methods significantly reduced deviations from linearity for fractional charges, with PZSIC being superior for C, Ne, and Ar.
- LSIC demonstrated accurate charge transfer in LiF dissociation, aligning with experimental and ab initio data.
Conclusions:
- The LSIC method substantially reduces delocalization errors in electronic structure calculations.
- LSIC offers improved accuracy and better description of charge transfer compared to PZSIC in specific cases.
- LSIC shows promise as a robust method for accurate electronic structure predictions.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Electron Configurations
The relative energies of the subshells determine the order in which atomic orbitals are filled (1s, 2s, 2p, 3s, 3p,...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
The Bohr Model
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: Organic Radicals

