Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Revision stapes surgery: problems with some solutions.

E L Derlacki

    The Laryngoscope
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Revision stapes surgery presents more challenges than primary operations, with prosthesis displacement being a key failure cause. Outcomes worsen with each subsequent revision, highlighting the need for realistic patient prognoses.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The fenestration operation for progressive deafness.

    The Medical and dental bulletin·2010
    Same author

    The fenestration operation for progressive deafness.

    Bulletin. Chicago Medical Society·2010
    Same author

    George E. Shambaugh, Jr, MD. A pioneer of American otomicrosurgery.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·1996
    Same author

    Patients with Meniére's disease possess IgE reacting with herpes family viruses.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·1995
    Same author

    Binaural hearing after middle ear surgery. Masking-level difference for interaural time and amplitude cues.

    Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology·1988
    Same author

    Effect of conductive hearing loss and middle ear surgery on binaural hearing.

    The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology·1986
    Same journal

    Orticochea Flap for Reconstruction of Large Scalp Defects: Outcomes and Technique.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Rising Pediatric Button Battery Injuries Despite Safety Efforts: An Analysis of National Injury Data.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Laryngeal Nerve Protection Devices in Thyroid Surgery: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Practice Patterns for the Management of Pediatric oSDB: What Is the Current National Landscape?

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Vocal Fold Opening Position Impacts Bowing Measures in Age-Related Vocal Atrophy.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    Same journal

    Association Between the Modified Frailty Index and Short-Term Total Thyroidectomy Complications.

    The Laryngoscope·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Otolaryngology
    • Neurosurgery
    • Surgical Innovation

    Background:

    • Revision stapes surgery involves complex pathological variables not typically seen in primary procedures.
    • Technical approaches for revision stapes surgery are less standardized, leading to less predictable outcomes.
    • Understanding these complexities is crucial for managing patient expectations and improving surgical planning.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the pathological variables and outcomes of revision stapes surgery.
    • To identify the primary causes of failure in revision stapes operations.
    • To correlate surgical outcomes with the number of previous revision procedures.

    Main Methods:

    • A retrospective review of 217 consecutive revision stapes operations over a ten-year period.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of intraoperative findings, including pathological variables and causes of failure.
  • Assessment of postoperative audiological results, specifically bone-air deficit.

    • Main Results:

    • Prosthesis displacement, with or without incus erosion, was the most frequent cause of failure (82%).
    • Oval window issues, such as footplate refixation and perilymph fistula, complicated 60% of prosthesis displacement cases.
    • Postoperative bone-air deficit of 10 dB or less was achieved in 65% of first revisions, 45% of second, and 25% of third revisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Revision stapes surgery is technically demanding due to increased pathological variables.
    • Prosthesis displacement and oval window complications are significant factors in revision stapes surgery failure.
    • Surgical success rates decrease significantly with each successive revision, necessitating realistic prognoses for patients.