Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

08:43
Fused Filament Fabrication FFF of Metal-Ceramic Components
Published on: January 11, 2019
17.3K
Understanding Melt Pool Behavior of 316L Stainless Steel in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing.
Zilong Zhang1, Tianyu Zhang1, Can Sun1
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29201, USA.
Micromachines
|February 24, 2024
Summary
Powder layer instability in laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) affects 316L stainless steel fabrication quality. A validated computational model explains melt pool dynamics and defects like swell-undercut, aiding process optimization.
Area of Science:
- Materials Science
- Additive Manufacturing
- Computational Modeling
Background:
- Laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) quality depends on laser-matter interaction and melt pool dynamics.
- Understanding melt pool behavior is crucial for optimizing fabrication processes and material properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally investigate melt pool characteristics and surface topography in 316L stainless steel during LPBF.
- To develop and validate a high-fidelity computational model for predicting melt pool dynamics and surface features.
- To elucidate the mechanisms behind defective morphologies, such as swell-undercut.
Main Methods:
- Single-track laser scanning experiments on bare plate and powder bed for 316L stainless steel.
- Development of a computational model incorporating fluid dynamics, heat transfer, vaporization, and solidification.
- Validation of the model against experimental melt pool dimensions and morphology.
- Multiple-track simulations to replicate surface features and assess process optimization potential.
Main Results:
- The powder layer significantly increases melt pool instability and surface irregularities compared to a bare plate.
- The computational model accurately predicts melt pool dimensions, morphology, and transition between conduction and keyholing modes.
- The model successfully explains the formation of swell-undercut defects, attributing them to recoil pressure and liquid refilling dynamics.
- Simulations demonstrate the model's capability to replicate surface features under various process conditions.
Conclusions:
- Powder layer presence introduces instabilities that degrade surface quality in LPBF of 316L stainless steel.
- The validated computational model provides a powerful tool for understanding and predicting melt pool behavior and defect formation.
- This research offers insights into optimizing LPBF process parameters for improved fabrication quality and defect reduction.
Keywords:
additive manufacturingfluid dynamicslaser powder bed fusionmelt pool instabilitysurface topography
