Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

06:08
A Cognitive Fusion-guided Prostate Biopsy Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transrectal Ultrasound
Published on: March 21, 2025
205
Opportunistic Prostate Cancer Screening with Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (VISIONING).
Christian Wetterauer1, Marc Matthias2, Heike Pueschel2
1Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria; University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
European Urology Focus
|February 24, 2024
Summary
Biparametric MRI (bpMRI) effectively screens for clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) without PSA levels. This method identified csPCa in 9.2% of men, outperforming traditional screening.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Radiology
- Oncology
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PCa) screening traditionally relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE).
- Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) offers a non-invasive imaging alternative for PCa detection.
- Opportunistic screening aims to identify cancers in individuals not actively seeking screening.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate bpMRI as a primary opportunistic screening tool for prostate cancer.
- To assess the effectiveness of bpMRI in identifying clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) without a PSA cut-off.
- To compare the detection rates of bpMRI against traditional screening methods.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of biopsy-naïve men over 45 years underwent 3 Tesla bpMRI, PSA testing, and DRE.
- Targeted-only biopsy was performed for lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scores of 3 or higher.
- Protocol adjustments included no immediate biopsy for PI-RADS 3 lesions, with follow-up MRI and biopsy only if lesions persisted or upgraded.
Main Results:
- 229 men were enrolled; 79 underwent biopsy, detecting PCa in 29 (12.7%) and csPCa in 21 (9.2%).
- bpMRI identified 21 csPCa cases, a detection rate that would have missed 38.1% of cases using PSA and DRE alone.
- The adjusted protocol reduced biopsies for PI-RADS 3 lesions by 54.6%, with 10.9 bpMRI scans needed per csPCa diagnosis (median PSA 1.26 ng/ml).
Conclusions:
- Opportunistic screening using bpMRI as a primary tool demonstrates higher sensitivity for csPCa detection compared to classical screening methods.
- bpMRI screening identified csPCa irrespective of PSA levels, suggesting its utility in a broader population.
- Further improvements in bpMRI effectiveness may be achieved by preselecting patients based on PSA levels, family history, and other biomarkers.

