Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

How to Build a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging LSCI System to Monitor Blood Flow
Published on: November 11, 2010
Dynamic light scattering and laser speckle contrast imaging of the brain: theory of the spatial and temporal
Bingxue Liu1,2, Dmitry Postnov3, David A Boas1,4
1Neurophotonics Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Abstract:
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) are closely related techniques that exploit the statistics of speckle patterns, which can be utilized to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). Conventionally, the temporal speckle intensity auto-correlation function is calculated in DLS, while the spatial speckle contrast K is calculated in LSCI measurements. Due to the rapid development of CMOS detection technology with increased camera frame rates while still maintaining a large number of pixels, the ensemble or spatial average of as well as the temporal contrast K can be easily calculated and utilized to quantify CBF. Although many models have been established, a proper summary is still lacking to fully characterize DLS and LSCI measurements for spatial and temporal statistics, laser coherence properties, various motion types, etc. As a result, there are many instances where theoretical models are misused. For instance, mathematical formulas derived in the diffusive regime or for ergodic systems are sometimes applied to small animal brain measurements, e.g., mice brains, where the assumptions are not valid. Therefore, we aim to provide a review of the speckle theory for both DLS and LSCI measurements with detailed derivations from first principles, taking into account non-ergodicity, spatial and temporal statistics of speckles, scatterer motion types, and laser coherence properties. From these calculations, we elaborate on the differences between spatial and temporal averaging for DLS and LSCI measurements that are typically ignored but can result in inaccurate measurements of blood flow, particularly the spatially varying nature of the static component in and K. We also obtained maps in in vivo mouse brain measurements using high frame rate CMOS cameras which have not been demonstrated before, and compared with and K. This work provides a useful guide for choosing the correct model to analyze spatial and temporal speckle statistics in in-vivo DLS and LSCI measurements.
More Related Videos
07:20A Novel Approach to Overcome Movement Artifact When Using a Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging System for Alternating Speeds of Blood Microcirculation
Published on: August 30, 2017
07:06Simultaneous Evaluation of Cerebral Hemodynamics and Light Scattering Properties of the In Vivo Rat Brain Using Multispectral Diffuse Reflectance Imaging
Published on: May 7, 2017