Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

109
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
109
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

240
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
240
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

13.0K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.0K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.3K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Informing Intervention: An Exploration of Behavioral and Social-Emotional IEP Goals for Students with ASD.

Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

SLD Models and Assessment Data Sources: Effects on Identification and Confidence.

Journal of learning disabilities·2025
Same author

Assessing Beliefs About Intrinsic and Extrinsic Determinants of SLD: Evaluating the Factor Structure of a Novel Instrument.

Journal of learning disabilities·2024
Same author

What interventions are cost-effective? A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of school-based programs from 2000 to 2020.

School psychology (Washington, D.C.)·2023
Same author

From microbe to metaphor: virus-like problems in organizations.

Frontiers in psychology·2023
Same author

Sticking with Programs That Do Not Work: The Role of Escalation of Commitment in Schools.

Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 2, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.0K

A Mixed Methods Examination of Decision-Making During Program Exploration and Implementation in Schools.

Courtenay A Barrett1, Dustin J Sleesman2, Tazkira Amin3

  • 1Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. morsicou@msu.edu.

Prevention Science : the Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research
|February 28, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

School administrators prioritize program need and community support when adopting evidence-based programs (EBPs). They monitor intervention fidelity, outcome data, and resources for successful implementation.

Keywords:
AdoptionDecision-makingEPISImplementation scienceProgress monitoringSchool administrators

More Related Videos

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 2, 2025

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
00:08

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.0K
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.9K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

6.7K

Area of Science:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychology
  • Educational Administration
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Schools are vital for promoting healthy youth development via evidence-based programs (EBPs).
  • Preventive EBPs are underutilized in schools, hindering youth well-being.
  • The Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework identifies factors influencing EBP adoption and monitoring.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically identify factors influencing school administrators' decision-making for adopting and monitoring preventive EBPs.
  • To understand the prioritization of these factors by administrators.

Main Methods:

  • Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 school administrators in the Midwestern U.S.
  • Qualitative data were analyzed to identify decision-making factors for EBP adoption and progress monitoring.

Main Results:

  • Administrators prioritize five factors for adoption: need, buy-in, fit, resources, and program characteristics.
  • For progress monitoring, administrators prioritize fidelity, outcome data, buy-in, resources, and program characteristics.

Conclusions:

  • Understanding administrators' decision-making criteria is crucial for increasing EBP implementation in schools.
  • Tailoring EBP implementation strategies to align with administrators' priorities can enhance adoption and sustainability.