Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Selecting a randomization method for a multi-center clinical trial with stochastic recruitment considerations.
Oleksandr Sverdlov1, Yevgen Ryeznik2, Volodymyr Anisimov3
1Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA. alex.sverdlov@novartis.com.
Dynamic balancing randomization (DBR) offers a superior balance-randomness tradeoff for multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with competitive patient recruitment. Carefully chosen thresholds enhance DBR
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Biostatistics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Multi-center randomized controlled trials (RCTs) require careful design considerations, including sample size, center selection, and participant recruitment strategies.
- Sequential randomization methods are crucial for multi-center RCTs, with or without stratification factors.
- This study focuses on assessing randomization methods under a competitive patient recruitment policy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate various randomization methods for multi-center 1:1 RCTs.
- To assess these methods within the context of a competitive patient recruitment process.
- To compare the performance of different stratification and balancing techniques.
Main Methods:
- A Poisson-gamma model was used to simulate the patient recruitment process.
- Sixteen distinct randomization methods were investigated, including unstratified, region-stratified, center-stratified, and dynamic balancing randomization (DBR).
- Monte Carlo simulations assessed statistical properties like recruitment time, treatment imbalance, and allocation efficiency.
Main Results:
- Maximum tolerated imbalance (MTI) methods (e.g., big stick, Ehrenfest urn) outperform conventional permuted block designs (PBD) in balance-randomness tradeoff.
- DBR effectively controls imbalance across trial, region, and center levels while preserving randomization.
- Increasing study centers accelerates recruitment but can increase center-level imbalances; larger block sizes or MTI thresholds improve the randomness-balance tradeoff.
Conclusions:
- The selection of an appropriate randomization method is critical for multi-center RCT design.
- Dynamic balancing randomization (DBR) emerges as a highly effective strategy for trials with competitive patient recruitment.
- Optimizing MTI thresholds within DBR is recommended for robust trial design.
More Related Videos
00:04A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Random Sampling Method
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Group Design
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...