Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2025

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
Published on: January 31, 2014
Matching the right study design to decision-maker questions: Results from a Delphi study
Cristián Mansilla1,2, Gordon Guyatt3, Arthur Sweetman4
1McMaster Health Forum, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
This study guides decision-makers on selecting appropriate research study designs for various questions. It uses expert consensus to rank study designs, aiding evidence-based decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Health Systems Research
- Evidence-Based Practice
Background:
- Research evidence is crucial for informed decision-making at all stages.
- Evidence-support systems are vital for matching evidence supply with demand.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide guidance on selecting the most suitable study designs for different types of decision-making questions.
- To help decision-makers, evidence intermediaries, researchers, and funders commission, use, or fund appropriate study designs.
Main Methods:
- A two-round online Delphi approach involving methodological experts from diverse backgrounds.
- Experts prioritized study designs for 40 distinct question types, with consensus defined by Kendall's W > 0.6 and p<0.05.
- Rankings were sorted by median ranks and interquartile ranges to identify top-performing study designs.
Main Results:
- Consensus was reached for 28 out of 40 questions across two Delphi rounds.
- Key consensus areas included clarifying societal problems (8/15), finding solutions (12/13), and implementation/monitoring (4/6 each).
- The study identified the four most suitable study designs for 28 different question types.
Conclusions:
- This research offers practical guidance on matching study designs to specific decision-making needs.
- The findings empower stakeholders to make more informed choices regarding research design commissioning and utilization.
- Effective use of evidence-based study designs can enhance the impact of research on policy and practice.
More Related Videos
00:08A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
06:16Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Group Design
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...