Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025
Retinal Vascular Reactivity as Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: March 26, 2020
Assessment of Visual Function with Cotoretigene Toliparvovec in X-Linked Retinitis Pigmentosa in the Randomized
Byron L Lam1, Mark E Pennesi2, Christine N Kay3
1Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.
Purpose:
Cotoretigene toliparvovec (BIIB112/AAV8-RPGR) is an investigational vector-based gene therapy designed to provide a full-length, codon-optimized retinitis pigmentosa GTPase regulator (RPGR) protein to individuals with RPGR-associated X-linked retinitis pigmentosa (XLRP). We assessed efficacy and tolerability of cotoretigene toliparvovec subretinal gene therapy.
Design:
Part 2 of the XIRIUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03116113) was a phase 2/3, 12-month, randomized (1:1:1) dose-expansion study.
Participants:
Male patients ≥10 years of age with RPGR-associated XLRP were included.
Methods:
Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to receive low-dose subretinal cotoretigene toliparvovec (5 × 1010 vector genomes/eye), high-dose cotoretigene toliparvovec (2.5 × 1011 vector genomes/eye) or to be an untreated control participant.
Main Outcome Measures:
The primary end point was the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria (≥ 7-dB improvement at ≥ 5 of 16 central loci). Secondary end points included change from baseline in retinal sensitivity at the central 16 loci and the entire 68 loci at 12 months and change from baseline in low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) at 12 months, as well as the proportion of eyes with a ≥ 15-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study ETDRS letter LLVA and ≥ 10-ETDRS letter LLVA change from baseline at month 12.
Results:
Because of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, enrollment ended before reaching the initial target, leaving the trial underpowered. Twenty-nine participants were included (low-dose group, n = 10; high-dose group, n = 10; control group, n = 9). At month 12, the percentage of participants meeting microperimetry responder criteria was not significantly different between either cotoretigene toliparvovec group (low dose, 37.5% [P = 0.3181]; high dose, 25.0% [P = 0.5177]) and the control group (22.2%). However, the mean change from baseline in microperimetry sensitivity improved significantly with the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (P = 0.0350). Significant improvement in LLVA occurred in the low-dose group versus the control group at month 12 (33.3% difference [80% confidence interval, 14.7%-55.2%]; P = 0.0498). Three ocular-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in the low-dose group versus 7 SAEs in the high-dose group.
Conclusions:
The primary microperimetry end point was not met. Significant improvements in LLVA and mean microperimetry were observed compared with controls and fewer SAEs occured with low-dose compared with high dose cotoretigene toliparvovec.
Financial Disclosure(S):
Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
