Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
Published on: July 27, 2021
GWABLUP: genome-wide association assisted best linear unbiased prediction of genetic values
Theo Meuwissen1, Leiv Sigbjorn Eikje2, Arne B Gjuvsland2
1Faculty of Life Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432, Ås, Norway. theo.meuwissen@nmbu.no.
Background:
Since the very beginning of genomic selection, researchers investigated methods that improved upon SNP-BLUP (single nucleotide polymorphism best linear unbiased prediction). SNP-BLUP gives equal weight to all SNPs, whereas it is expected that many SNPs are not near causal variants and thus do not have substantial effects. A recent approach to remedy this is to use genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings and increase the weights of GWAS-top-SNPs in genomic predictions. Here, we employ a genome-wide approach to integrate GWAS results into genomic prediction, called GWABLUP.
Results:
GWABLUP consists of the following steps: (1) performing a GWAS in the training data which results in likelihood ratios; (2) smoothing the likelihood ratios over the SNPs; (3) combining the smoothed likelihood ratio with the prior probability of SNPs having non-zero effects, which yields the posterior probability of the SNPs; (4) calculating a weighted genomic relationship matrix using the posterior probabilities as weights; and (5) performing genomic prediction using the weighted genomic relationship matrix. Using high-density genotypes and milk, fat, protein and somatic cell count phenotypes on dairy cows, GWABLUP was compared to GBLUP, GBLUP (topSNPs) with extra weights for GWAS top-SNPs, and BayesGC, i.e. a Bayesian variable selection model. The GWAS resulted in six, five, four, and three genome-wide significant peaks for milk, fat and protein yield and somatic cell count, respectively. GWABLUP genomic predictions were 10, 6, 7 and 1% more reliable than those of GBLUP for milk, fat and protein yield and somatic cell count, respectively. It was also more reliable than GBLUP (topSNPs) for all four traits, and more reliable than BayesGC for three of the traits. Although GWABLUP showed a tendency towards inflation bias for three of the traits, this was not statistically significant. In a multitrait analysis, GWABLUP yielded the highest accuracy for two of the traits. However, for SCC, which was relatively unrelated to the yield traits, including yield trait GWAS-results reduced the reliability compared to a single trait analysis.
Conclusions:
GWABLUP uses GWAS results to differentially weigh all the SNPs in a weighted GBLUP genomic prediction analysis. GWABLUP yielded up to 10% and 13% more reliable genomic predictions than GBLUP for single and multitrait analyses, respectively. Extension of GWABLUP to single-step analyses is straightforward.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Heritability
Polygenic Traits
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Multiple Allele Traits