Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Dietary interventions in cancer: a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials
Nosakhare Paul Ilerhunmwuwa1, Abul Hasan Shadali Abdul Khader2, Calvin Smith3
1One Brooklyn Health/Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Background:
Prior systematic reviews addressing the impact of diet on cancer outcomes have focused on specific dietary interventions. In this systematic review, we assessed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating dietary interventions for cancer patients, examining the range of interventions, endpoints, patient populations, and results.
Methods:
This systematic review identified all RCTs conducted before January 2023 testing dietary interventions in patients with cancer. Assessed outcomes included quality of life, functional outcomes, clinical cancer measurements (eg, progression-free survival, response rates), overall survival, and translational endpoints (eg, inflammatory markers).
Results:
In total, 252 RCTs were identified involving 31 067 patients. The median sample size was 71 (interquartile range 41 to 118), and 80 (32%) studies had a sample size greater than 100. Most trials (n = 184, 73%) were conducted in the adjuvant setting. Weight or body composition and translational endpoints were the most common primary endpoints (n = 64, 25%; n = 52, 21%, respectively). Direct cancer measurements and overall survival were primary endpoints in 20 (8%) and 7 (3%) studies, respectively. Eight trials with a primary endpoint of cancer measurement (40%) met their endpoint. Large trials in colon (n = 1429), breast (n = 3088), and prostate cancer (n = 478) each showed no effect of dietary interventions on endpoints measuring cancer.
Conclusion:
Most RCTs of dietary interventions in cancer are small and measure nonclinical endpoints. Although only a small number of large RCTs have been conducted to date, these trials have not shown an improvement in cancer outcomes. Currently, there is limited evidence to support dietary interventions as a therapeutic tool in cancer care.
Insights
This systematic review found that most randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dietary interventions for cancer patients are small and focus on non-clinical outcomes. Large-scale RCTs have not demonstrated improvements in cancer progression or survival, indicating limited evidence for diet as a cancer therapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Nutritional Science
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Previous reviews focused on specific dietary interventions for cancer.
- This review comprehensively assessed all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on dietary interventions in cancer patients.
- Examined a wide range of interventions, patient populations, and outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Most RCTs in this field are small and utilize non-clinical endpoints.
- Limited large-scale RCTs have not shown benefits in cancer outcomes.
- Current evidence suggests restricted support for dietary interventions as a therapeutic strategy in cancer management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

