A clustering effectiveness measurement model based on merging similar clusters
Guiqin Duan1,2, Chensong Zou3
1School of Computer and Information Engineering, Guangdong Songshan Vocational and Technical College, Shaoguan, China.
Peerj. Computer Science
|March 4, 2024
Summary
This study introduces a new clustering model that merges similar clusters to improve accuracy and evaluation for the affinity propagation (AP) algorithm. The enhanced model offers superior performance in intrusion detection tasks.
Area of Science:
- Data Science
- Machine Learning
- Algorithm Analysis
Background:
- Affinity Propagation (AP) algorithm suffers from local clustering and inaccurate evaluation, especially with high cluster proportions.
- Existing internal evaluation indices lack variety, leading to invalid clustering results.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose a clustering effectiveness measurement model that addresses AP algorithm limitations.
- To enhance clustering accuracy and provide reliable evaluation metrics.
Main Methods:
- Merging similar clusters based on inter-cluster similarity and average inter-cluster similarity to reduce the maximum number of clusters (K).
- Developing a new scheme to calculate intra-cluster compactness, inter-cluster relative density, and inter-cluster overlap coefficient.
- Designing internal evaluation indices based on intra-cluster cohesion and inter-cluster dispersion.
Main Results:
- The proposed model correctly performs clustering and classification on UCI and NSL-KDD datasets.
- Demonstrates accurate clustering range determination.
- Significantly outperforms three improved clustering algorithms in intrusion detection metrics like detection rate and false positive rate (FPR).
Conclusions:
- The developed model effectively overcomes AP algorithm's clustering and evaluation issues.
- Provides a robust framework for clustering and classification, particularly beneficial for intrusion detection systems.
Related Concept Videos
Cluster Sampling Method
11.9K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
11.9K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Sampling Plans
181
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
181
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
186
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
186
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance
337
Kendall's Coefficient of Concordance (W), also known as Kendall's W, is a non-parametric statistical measure used to assess the agreement or concordance between multiple raters or judges when they rank a set of items. It is often used when you have ordinal data (ranks) and you want to see if there is consistency or consensus among the raters. It is widely applied in research areas such as psychology, medicine, and social sciences, where multiple judges are asked to rank or rate subjects...
337
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes
3.3K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.3K


