Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
Identifying an optimal approach for the placement of pterygoid implants: A 3D finite element analysis
Jun Chen1, Lingtong Bu2, Guangzhou Xu3
1Postgraduate student, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, PR China.
Statement Of Problem:
A consensus on the optimal approach to the placement of pterygoid implants is lacking.
Purpose:
The purpose of this finite element analysis study was to determine the optimal approach to the placement of pterygoid implants by comparing biomechanical behavior.
Material And Methods:
An edentulous and moderately atrophic maxilla with the anatomic structure of the pterygomaxillary region was constructed. Complete arch restorations with 4 standard anterior implants and pterygoid implants in 3 approaches were simulated: L70, long pterygoid implants (4.1×18 mm) inclined at 70 degrees relative to the Frankfort horizontal plane with anchorage in the pterygoid process; L45, long pterygoid implants (4.1×20 mm) inclined at 45 degrees with anchorage in the pterygoid process; and S45, shorter pterygoid implants (4.1×13 mm) inclined 45 degrees without apical anchorage. The L70, L45, and S45 groups were classified as D or S depending on the bone quality: D3 (dense trabecular bone) or D4 (sparse trabecular bone). A total of 6 finite element models were built. The bone failure theory, based on the von Mises theory, was used to judge yielding of the trabecular bone. The von Mises stress (σVM) distribution was measured in the cortical bone, the trabecular bone, and on the implant surface. Deformation (DF) distribution was obtained for the entire bone (DFB) and bone surrounding the pterygoid implant (DFP).
Results:
L70 showed a lower maximum σVM value (maxσVM), more uniform σVM distribution in the cortical bone, trabecular bone, and on the implant surface and a lower maximum DFp value (maxDFp), especially in the D4 bone. The biomechanical behaviors were similar in L45 and S45 with no stress distribution in the pterygoid process. In the D4 bone, L70, L45, and S45 exceeded the limited stress of the bone failure theory by 50%, 130%, and 130%, while all values were under the limit in D3 bone.
Conclusions:
The approach of pterygoid implants inclined at 70 degrees relative to the Frankfort plane with anchorage in the pterygoid process was optimal, providing improved biomechanical behavior. Clinically, in the case of D4 bone, the inclined angulation of pterygoid implants should be 70 degrees to minimize the risk of failure.
