Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Navigating University Openness in Research Policy Inconsistent with Indigenous Data Sovereignty: A Case Analysis
Molly Wick1, Deanna Erickson2, Joel Hoffman3
1PhD candidate at the University of Minnesota Duluth and a student trainee at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Toxicology and Ecology Division.
University research policies that ignore Indigenous sovereignty rights can delay vital studies. Revisions are needed to ensure ethical collaboration and data ownership for tribal nations.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Indigenous Studies
- Data Governance
Background:
- Indigenous nations possess sovereign rights to control data generated from their communities and resources.
- University "openness in research" policies often prioritize institutional data control, potentially conflicting with tribal sovereignty.
- Past unethical research practices have led Indigenous communities to establish data ownership policies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the impact of conflicting data ownership policies on a university-led study of cultural ecosystem services in the St. Louis River estuary.
- To highlight how university open research policies can hinder collaboration with Indigenous nations when Indigenous sovereignty is not explicitly addressed.
Main Methods:
- A collaborative study on cultural ecosystem services in the St. Louis River estuary (Nagaajiwanaang) involving a university and a local band of Ojibwe.
- Analysis of data ownership claims based on university "openness in research" policies and the Band's data ownership policies.
Main Results:
- A nearly year-long delay in the research project occurred due to disputes over data ownership between the university and the Band.
- The study demonstrated that open research policies lacking consideration for Indigenous sovereignty impede collaborative research efforts.
- Discrepancies between university and tribal data governance frameworks created significant research coordination challenges.
Conclusions:
- University open research policies must be revised to explicitly incorporate and respect Indigenous sovereignty to foster equitable collaboration.
- Adopting formal principles for ethical research with sovereign tribal governments is crucial for improving trust and coordination between universities and tribal nations.
- Addressing data ownership and sovereignty is essential for advancing research that benefits both Indigenous communities and academic institutions.
More Related Videos
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
13:44Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Archival Research
Ethics in Research
Statistical Analysis: Overview
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data