Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

07:59
Training Dogs for Awake, Unrestrained Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: October 13, 2019
7.6K
Radiographic morphology of canines tested for sexual dimorphism via convolutional-neural-network-based artificial
A Franco1, A P Cornacchia2, D Moreira3
1Division of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil; Department of Therapeutic Stomatology, Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
Morphologie : Bulletin De L'Association Des Anatomistes
|March 9, 2024
Summary
This study used artificial intelligence to analyze left mandibular canine teeth for sex dimorphism. The AI achieved moderate accuracy (mean 68%), suggesting limited use in human identification.
Area of Science:
- Forensic Anthropology
- Dental Forensics
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Background:
- Permanent left mandibular canines are utilized for sex determination in forensic identification.
- The efficacy of canine morphology for distinguishing sex remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sexual dimorphism of permanent left mandibular canines using an artificial intelligence (AI) approach.
- To assess the accuracy of AI in predicting sex based on canine morphology across different age groups.
Main Methods:
- A dataset of 13,046 radiographic images of left mandibular canines from 5,838 males and 7,208 females (ages 6-22.99) was analyzed.
- The DenseNet121 model was employed for binary sex classification across 17 one-year age categories.
- Performance was quantified using accuracy rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and confusion matrices.
Main Results:
- AI classification accuracy ranged from 57% to 76%, with a mean of 68% ±5%.
- The area under the ROC curve (AUC) varied between 0.58 and 0.77.
- Optimal performance was observed around age 12, with lower accuracy near age 7.
Conclusions:
- The AI-based analysis indicates moderate, but not definitive, sexual dimorphism in left mandibular canines.
- Canine morphology analysis for sex estimation should be a secondary method, used only when other dimorphic features are unavailable.

