Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Syndrome: Conceptualising an Approach to Health Economic Modelling.

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2026
Same author

IL-6/STAT3 signaling drives mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation dysfunction and AP-1 activation in fibroblasts during sepsis-induced lung injury.

Free radical biology & medicine·2026
Same author

Multi-organ imaging and genetics show the impact of sleep patterns on the human brain and body.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Fulzerasib plus cetuximab in first-line KRAS<sup>G12C</sup>-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (KROCUS): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1b/2 trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Computation and resource efficient genome-wide association analysis for large-scale imaging studies.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Author Correction: UKB-MDRMF: a multi-disease risk and multimorbidity framework based on UK biobank data.

Nature communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

11.7K

Merging or ensembling: integrative analysis in multiple neuroimaging studies.

Yue Shan1, Chao Huang2, Yun Li1,3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United States.

Biometrics
|March 11, 2024
PubMed
Summary

This study compares merging and ensembling methods for spatially varying coefficient mixed effects models (SVCMEM) in neuroimaging. Merging integrates data, while ensembling combines individual models, offering strategies for optimal integrative learning.

Keywords:
ensemble learnerinterstudy heterogeneitymerged learnerneuroimagingspatially varying coefficient mixed effects model

More Related Videos

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

11.7K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

16.9K
Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time
07:12

Using Informational Connectivity to Measure the Synchronous Emergence of fMRI Multi-voxel Information Across Time

Published on: July 1, 2014

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Statistical modeling
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Integrating data from multiple biomedical studies is crucial for robust neuroimaging analysis.
  • Spatially varying coefficient mixed effects models (SVCMEM) offer a flexible framework for analyzing complex spatial data.
  • Existing methods for integrative learning require systematic investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate merging and ensembling methods for SVCMEM for integrative neuroimaging data learning.
  • To compare the prediction accuracy of merged and ensemble approaches under varying inter-study heterogeneity.
  • To provide guidelines for selecting between merging and ensembling strategies and derive optimal ensemble weights.

Main Methods:

  • Developed and compared "merged" (single model on combined data) and "ensemble" (weighted average of individual models) approaches.
  • Investigated prediction accuracy across different degrees of inter-study heterogeneity.
  • Derived theoretical guidelines for model selection and optimal ensemble weighting.

Main Results:

  • Both merged and ensemble methods demonstrate varying prediction accuracies depending on inter-study heterogeneity.
  • Asymptotic guidelines were established to inform the choice between merging and ensembling.
  • Optimal weights for the ensemble learner were derived and validated through simulations.

Conclusions:

  • The choice between merging and ensembling SVCMEM depends on the degree of inter-study heterogeneity.
  • The proposed methods provide a framework for effective integrative learning in neuroimaging.
  • The findings are validated through extensive simulations and application to large-scale neuroimaging studies.