Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validity, reliability, and neither.

T R Knapp

    Nursing Research
    |May 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study clarifies that not all research on measurement instruments are validity or reliability studies. Some investigations should be classified as substantive studies, not methodological ones.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Long-term medical device accountability: an information technology solution.

    The International journal of risk & safety in medicine·2013
    Same author

    Discharging older patients from home care: who decides and when?

    Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine·2001
    Same author

    Is arm span an accurate measure of height in young and middle-age adults?

    Clinical nursing research·2001
    Same author

    Property rights and privacy principles.

    Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM·2001
    Same author

    The analysis of the data for two-way contingency tables.

    Research in nursing & health·1999
    Same author

    Reader raises concerns regarding changing i.v. administration sets.

    Oncology nursing forum·1999
    Same journal

    ENRS President's Message.

    Nursing research·2026
    Same journal

    ENRS President's Message.

    Nursing research·2026
    Same journal

    Theory in Science.

    Nursing research·2026
    Same journal

    Using National Databases to Analyze Nurse Suicide Mortality.

    Nursing research·2026
    Same journal

    Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia.

    Nursing research·2026
    Same journal

    Study Protocol to Characterize Symptom Experience During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

    Nursing research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Psychometrics
    • Educational Measurement
    • Psychological Assessment

    Background:

    • Many studies involving measurement instruments are categorized as either validity or reliability studies.
    • However, some research, like construct stability investigations and correlational analyses across test levels, do not fit these methodological classifications.
    • This ambiguity can lead to mislabeling in scientific literature.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To propose a clearer classification system for research on measurement instruments.
    • To differentiate between methodological investigations (validity, reliability) and substantive research.
    • To guide authors in accurately labeling their studies in test manuals and journal articles.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of existing research categorizations.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Definition and differentiation of methodological versus substantive study types.
  • Examination of specific research examples (e.g., construct stability, inter-level correlations).

    • Main Results:

    • Identified that studies on construct stability and score correlations are not inherently validity or reliability studies.
    • Proposed that such investigations should be labeled as substantive studies.
    • Advocated for precise labeling to avoid confusion in the scientific record.

    Conclusions:

    • Authors should accurately label their research on measurement instruments.
    • Studies not focused on validity or reliability should be identified as substantive investigations.
    • Clearer labeling enhances scientific communication and understanding in psychometrics and related fields.