Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 9, 2026

07:28
Psychophysically-anchored, Robust Thresholding in Studying Pain-related Lateralization of Oscillatory Prestimulus Activity
Published on: January 21, 2017
7.0K
PRO-Angoff method for remote standard setting: establishing clinical thresholds for the upper digestive disease tool
Minji K Lee1, Mohamad K Abou Chaar2, Shanda H Blackmon2
1Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Ave SW, 55902, Rochester, MN, USA. lee.minji@mayo.edu.
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
|March 13, 2024
Summary
New cut scores for the Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) Tool™ were established using virtual standard setting. This method proved effective and acceptable for developing reliable symptom control benchmarks.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Health Outcomes Research
- Psychometrics
Background:
- The Upper Digestive Disease (UDD) Tool™ assesses symptom frequency, intensity, and interference across nine domains, plus physical and mental health via PROMIS domains.
- Current symptom domains require updated cut scores for precise interpretation.
Purpose of the Study:
- Establish cut scores for updated symptom domains of the UDD Tool™.
- Evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of virtual standard setting for this process.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the extended Angoff method with subject matter experts.
- Refined performance descriptions and categorized symptom control into good, moderate, and poor.
- Calculated cut scores based on average borderline patient scores per item.
Main Results:
- Established two cut scores per domain: good/moderate (mean 28.6) and moderate/poor (mean 54.5).
- Panelists confirmed the importance of symptom timing, patient populations, and item content for score interpretation.
Conclusions:
- Virtual standard setting was deemed effective and acceptable, yielding valid cut scores.
- Further validation with patient perspectives and exploration of dashboard display preferences are recommended.

