Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

06:04
Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
493
Measuring How Systems-Centered® Members Connect with Group Dynamics: FSQ-2 Construct Validity
International Journal of Group Psychotherapy
|March 13, 2024
Summary
Systems-Centered Training (SCT) and its Functional Subgrouping (FS) method improve group dynamics. The Functional Subgrouping Questionnaire-2 (FSQ-2) effectively measures FS, showing increased scores with experience and over time.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Group Dynamics
- Organizational Behavior
Background:
- Group dynamics and member behavior are complex, with challenges like scapegoating persisting.
- Systems-Centered Training (SCT) utilizes Functional Subgrouping (FS) to address these issues.
- The Functional Subgrouping Questionnaire-2 (FSQ-2) was developed to quantify FS within groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the construct of the FSQ-2.
- To examine FSQ-2 score changes across training sessions.
- To investigate the relationship between SCT experience and FSQ-2 scores, and potential moderation effects.
Main Methods:
- A construct validity study of the FSQ-2 was conducted.
- Data were collected from groups participating in various SCT training events.
- Statistical analyses examined score changes over time and correlations with SCT experience.
Main Results:
- FSQ-2 scores were higher for individuals with greater SCT experience.
- FSQ-2 scores demonstrated an increase over the course of SCT training.
- Changes in FSQ-2 scores over time were not significantly moderated by the level of SCT experience for most items.
Conclusions:
- The findings support the construct validity of the FSQ-2.
- The study reinforces the validity of the Systems-Centered Training (SCT) model.
- Further research on SCT and the FSQ-2 is recommended to explore these dynamics more deeply.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
345
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
345
Reliability and Validity
12.7K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.7K
Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
Cochran's Q Test
319
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
319
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
49.9K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
49.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K

