Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 1, 2025

Aerosol-assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition of Metal Oxide Structures: Zinc Oxide Rods
Published on: September 14, 2017
Metal oxide-based gas sensor array for VOCs determination in complex mixtures using machine learning
Shivam Singh1, Sajana S1, Poornima Varma2
1School of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India.
Abstract:
Detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the breath is becoming a viable route for the early detection of diseases non-invasively. This paper presents a sensor array of 3 component metal oxides that give maximal cross-sensitivity and can successfully use machine learning methods to identify four distinct VOCs in a mixture. The metal oxide sensor array comprises NiO-Au (ohmic), CuO-Au (Schottky), and ZnO-Au (Schottky) sensors made by the DC reactive sputtering method and having a film thickness of 80-100 nm. The NiO and CuO films have ultrafine particle sizes of < 50 nm and rough surface texture, while ZnO films consist of nanoscale platelets. This array was subjected to various VOC concentrations, including ethanol, acetone, toluene, and chloroform, one by one and in a pair/mix of gases. Thus, the response values show severe interference and departure from commonly observed power law behavior. The dataset obtained from individual gases and their mixtures were analyzed using multiple machine learning algorithms, such as Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Decision Tree, Linear Regression, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Linear Discriminant Analysis, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine. KNN and RF have shown more than 99% accuracy in classifying different varying chemicals in the gas mixtures. In regression analysis, KNN has delivered the best results with an R2 value of more than 0.99 and LOD of 0.012 ppm, 0.015 ppm, 0.014 ppm, and 0.025 ppm for predicting the concentrations of acetone, toluene, ethanol, and chloroform, respectively, in complex mixtures. Therefore, it is demonstrated that the array utilizing the provided algorithms can classify and predict the concentrations of the four gases simultaneously for disease diagnosis and treatment monitoring.
More Related Videos
08:23Analyzing the Photo-oxidation of 2-propanol at Indoor Air Level Concentrations Using Field Asymmetric Ion Mobility Spectrometry
Published on: June 14, 2018
09:49Identification of Olfactory Volatiles using Gas Chromatography-Multi-unit Recordings GCMR in the Insect Antennal Lobe
Published on: February 24, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-II
Gas Chromatography: Overview of Detectors
A non-destructive detector allows a sample to be analyzed without altering or consuming it, meaning the sample can be collected after detection for further analysis. Examples include thermal conductivity detectors and...
Gas Chromatography: Types of Detectors-I
TCD is the earliest and most widely used detector that operates by measuring the changes in the thermal conductivity of the carrier gas. When a sample compound enters the detector,...
Classification of Titrimetric Analysis Based on Reaction Types
Titrations between an acid and a base lead to neutralization reactions that form...
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography: Types of Detectors
Mass Spectrometry: Complex Analysis
GC–MS is a powerful hyphenated method commonly used in forensics and environmental...