Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 6, 2026

05:52
Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping and Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer at Early Stage with Laparoscopy
Published on: August 19, 2021
11.4K
Preterm Birth Following Active Surveillance vs Loop Excision for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2
Kathrine Dyhr Lycke1,2,3, Johnny Kahlert4, Dina Overgaard Eriksen1,2,3
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
JAMA Network Open
|March 14, 2024
Summary
Active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) showed similar preterm birth risk compared to immediate treatment. However, delayed loop electrosurgical excision (LEEP) after surveillance increased preterm birth risk.
Area of Science:
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Reproductive Health
- Oncology
Background:
- Active surveillance for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2) is increasingly adopted in high-income nations.
- Excisional treatment for CIN2 is linked to increased preterm birth risk.
- The impact of active surveillance on preterm birth risk, considering dysplasia's own association with preterm birth, remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk of preterm birth in women diagnosed with CIN2 who undergo active surveillance versus immediate loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
Main Methods:
- A historical, population-based cohort study in Denmark (1998-2018) included women with a first-time CIN2 diagnosis and a subsequent singleton birth.
- Women were grouped into active surveillance or immediate LEEP based on initial management.
- Preterm birth risk was assessed using modified Poisson regression with inverse probability treatment weighting.
Main Results:
- The study included 10,537 women with CIN2; 42% had active surveillance, 58% had immediate LEEP.
- Preterm birth risk was comparable between active surveillance and immediate LEEP groups (RR, 1.03).
- Women undergoing delayed LEEP after active surveillance had a 30% higher risk of preterm birth compared to immediate LEEP (RR, 1.29).
Conclusions:
- Active surveillance for CIN2 did not increase preterm birth risk compared to immediate LEEP.
- Delayed LEEP following active surveillance was associated with a significantly higher risk of preterm birth.
- Risk stratification at CIN2 diagnosis is crucial to identify women who might benefit from immediate treatment to mitigate preterm birth risk.

