Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025
Setting a Successful Sorting for Extracellular Vesicle Isolation
Published on: October 11, 2024
Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Therapy for Asthma in Murine Models: A Systematic Review and
Shahryar Rajai Firouzabadi1,2, Ida Mohammadi3,4, Kiana Ghafourian3
1School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Koodakyar street, Daneshjoo Boulevard, Tehran, Iran. shahryarrajai@sbmu.ac.ir.
Background:
Asthma is a common disease, and among the most predominant causes of the years lived with disability. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs) have emerged as a promising avenue for asthma management. The objective of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of pre-clinical studies investigating the therapeutic use of MSC-EVs in murine models of asthma.
Methods:
A systematic search of electronic databases was performed. Meta-analyses were conducted on broncho-alveolar lavage fluid (BALF) cells and cytokines, as well as airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values and histological staining scores to determine the efficacy of MSC-EVs-based therapy, comparing treated rodents with untreated ones. BALF IL-4, BALF total cells, and BALF eosinophils were chosen as the primary outcomes, while airway hyper-responsiveness Penh values, BALF cytokines excluding IL-4, and histological staining scores were chosen as secondary outcomes.
Results:
A total of 19 eligible studies were included in the current systematic review, with 9 assessing BALF IL-4, 11 assessing BALF total cells, and 10 assessing BALF eosinophils. Pooled Hedges' g (p-value) for each outcome was - 4.407 (< 0.001), -4.976 (< 0.001), and - 4.071 (< 0.001), showing that MSC-EVs therapy inhibits asthma pathology. Changes in secondary outcomes also indicated a reduction in inflammation, goblet cell hyperplasia, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Subgroup analyses did not reveal significant disparities between the type of rodents and administration routes, and meta-regressions were only significant for MSC-EVs source and dose in the IL-4 meta-analysis, and for administration frequency and time from the last challenge to sacrifice in the BALF total cell meta-analysis.
Conclusion:
This review highlights the current pre-clinical evidence of MSC-EVs therapy for asthma and finds its application ameliorates multiple aspects of asthma's pathology. We further underline the importance of MSC-EVs source, dose, administration frequency, and timing on the therapeutic effect and warrant further investigation and clinical translation to assess the best treatment regimen and to gauge the efficacy of EV therapy in human asthma cases.
