Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Test-retest reliability of spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic measures in marker-based 3D gait analysis: A systematic review.

Gait & posture·2026
Same author

Decreased change of direction angle, increased ACL load: angle-dependent anterior cruciate ligament loading across different change of direction sprints in male soccer players.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same author

Concurrent validation of OpenCap for identifying ACL re-injury risk factors during a drop jump test in a healthy cohort.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Lower Extremity Joint Contact Loads: Current Trends, Common Pitfalls and Future Directions.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same author

VReeze: an open-source virtual reality for the examination of freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease - a study design of a crossover repeated measures study for validation.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

The effect of inaccurate initial contact events on kinematics in healthy and pathological gait.

Gait & posture·2025
Same journal

Shear wave velocity of biceps femoris and medial gastrocnemius in different positions and intensities: a cross-sectional study in healthy young males.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Gait event detection using hybrid EMG/IMU systems: effect of SENIAM-constrained sensor placement on lower limb segments.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Relationship between knee adduction moment and knee contact forces during walking and running with modified foot progression angles.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Scaling contact force parameters across body size, limb count, and number of contact spheres.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The extrapolated body center of mass predicts subsequent foot placement choice during dynamic single-leg landings.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Lateral reactive stepping responses differ between individuals with and without transfemoral amputation.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.4K

Inter-trial variability is higher in 3D markerless compared to marker-based motion capture: Implications for data

Brian Horsak1, Kerstin Prock2, Philipp Krondorfer2

  • 1Center for Digital Health and Social Innovation, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Campus-Platz 1, St. Pölten, 3100, Austria; Institute of Health Sciences, St. Pölten University of Applied Sciences, Campus-Platz 1, St. Pölten, 3100, Austria.

Journal of Biomechanics
|March 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Markerless motion capture shows higher inter-trial variability than marker-based systems in gait analysis. This increased variability, ranging from 6.6% to 22.0%, can affect human movement science findings.

Keywords:
Deep learningGait analysisIntra-session variabilityOpenCapPose estimationmarkerless motion capture

More Related Videos

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.1K
3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents
10:19

3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents

Published on: August 3, 2019

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.4K
Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.1K
3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents
10:19

3D Kinematic Gait Analysis for Preclinical Studies in Rodents

Published on: August 3, 2019

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement Science
  • Clinical Gait Analysis

Background:

  • Markerless motion capture offers ease of use for large-scale, out-of-laboratory human movement studies.
  • Previous research indicates acceptable accuracy but notes higher inter-trial variability in markerless gait data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the inter-trial variability between markerless (OpenCap) and marker-based motion capture systems.
  • To assess if gait pattern influences the variability difference between systems.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous recording of 18 healthy volunteers using OpenCap and a marker-based system.
  • Volunteers simulated four distinct gait patterns: physiological, crouch, circumduction, and equinus.
  • Comparison of inter-trial variability metrics between the two motion capture approaches.

Main Results:

  • Markerless systems exhibited increased inter-trial variability compared to marker-based systems, with a range of 6.6% to 22.0% across gait patterns.
  • Pose estimation pipelines in markerless systems contribute to variability in kinematic data.
  • Variability increases were observed across different gait patterns and natural variability levels.

Conclusions:

  • Markerless pose estimation introduces additional variability into kinematic gait data.
  • Averaged waveforms are recommended over single waveforms to mitigate increased inter-trial variability.
  • Caution is advised when employing variability-based metrics with markerless gait data due to potential misleading results.