Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

04:45
Intraoperative Assessment of Resection Margins in Oral Cavity Cancer: This is the Way
Published on: May 10, 2021
3.8K
Ergonomic RFID tag placement on surgical instruments - a preliminary user study.
Jan Heibeyn1, Mark Witte1, Sebastian Billig2
1Chair of Medical Engineering, 9165 RWTH Aachen University , Aachen, Germany.
Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering
|March 19, 2024
Summary
Attaching Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags to surgical instruments can hinder handling and decrease clinician satisfaction. Expert predictions of ideal tag placement did not fully align with clinician preferences, suggesting design modifications are needed.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgical Technology
- Human Factors Engineering
Background:
- Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) tags enable individual tracking of surgical instruments.
- Previous research identified potential RFID tag locations based on hand contact areas.
- Existing studies overlooked haptic perception and clinician interaction testing with tagged instruments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate prior findings through interaction-centered tests using RFID-tagged surgical instruments.
- To assess the influence of RFID tag placement on clinician handling and user satisfaction.
- To evaluate instrument design experts' ability to predict optimal RFID tag positions.
Main Methods:
- Clinicians performed interaction tests with real surgical instruments equipped with RFID tags.
- User satisfaction and handling comfort were evaluated for various tag positions.
- Instrument design experts rated tag positions and attempted to predict clinician preferences.
Main Results:
- Nearly all tested RFID tag positions reduced clinician user satisfaction compared to untagged instruments.
- RFID tags significantly influenced instrument orientation during comfortable handling, a key clinician concern.
- Instrument design experts showed limited success in predicting clinicians' preferred tag placements.
Conclusions:
- RFID tag integration negatively impacts clinician experience and instrument usability.
- Current RFID tag placement strategies require revision based on clinician feedback and haptic considerations.
- Further instrument design modifications are recommended, using clinician-identified ideal positions as a guide.

