Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Extraction and Characterization of Surfactants from Atmospheric Aerosols
Published on: April 21, 2017
QSPR for the prediction of critical micelle concentration of different classes of surfactants using machine learning
Nada Boukelkal1, Soufiane Rahal1, Redha Rebhi1
1Biomaterials and Transport Phenomena Laboratory (LBMPT), University of Yahia Fares, Faculty of Technology, Department of Process Engineering and Environment, Medea, 26000, Algeria.
Abstract:
The determination of the critical micelle concentration (CMC) is a crucial factor when evaluating surfactants, making it an essential tool in studying the properties of surfactants in various industrial fields. In this present research, we assembled a comprehensive set of 593 different classes of surfactants including, anionic, cationic, nonionic, zwitterionic, and Gemini surfactants to establish a link between their molecular structure and the negative logarithmic value of critical micelle concentration (pCMC) utilizing quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) methodologies. Statistical analysis revealed that a set of 14 significant Mordred descriptors (SlogP, GATS6d, nAcid, GATS8dv, GATS4dv, PEOE_VSA11, GATS8d, ATS0p, GATS1d, MATS5p, GATS3d, NdssC, GATS6dv and EState_VSA4), along with temperature, served as appropriate inputs. Different machine learning methods, such as multiple linear regression (MLR), random forest regression (RFR), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector regression (SVM), were employed in this study to build QSPR models. According to the statistical coefficients of QSPR models, SVR with Dragonfly hyperparameter optimization (SVR-DA) was the most accurate in predicting pCMC values, achieving (R2 = 0.9740, Q2 = 0.9739, r‾m2 = 0.9627, and Δrm2 = 0.0244) for the entire dataset.
Related Concept Videos
Detergent Purification of Membrane Proteins
Response Surface Methodology
The process of RSM involves several key steps:

