Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Goal setting and health risk reduction.

B Alexy

    Nursing Research
    |September 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    Client participation in health goal setting showed mixed results. Collaborative goal setting improved weight reduction, while provider-set goals were better for health age and life expectancy. Both methods improved some health behaviors.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Everything you learned about health you learned in grade school.

    Nurse educator·2006
    Same author

    A decade of distance education: RN to BSN.

    Nurse educator·2005
    Same author

    Home healthcare and client outcomes.

    Home healthcare nurse·2002
    Same author

    High-resource hospital users in an integrated delivery system.

    The Journal of nursing administration·1999
    Same author

    Use of the SF-36 to identify community dwelling rural elderly at risk for hospitalization.

    Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.)·1999
    Same author

    Identifying health status and health risks of older rural residents.

    Journal of community health nursing·1998

    Area of Science:

    • Health Behavior Change
    • Preventive Medicine
    • Patient Engagement

    Background:

    • Effective health risk reduction strategies are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
    • Goal setting is a common intervention, but the optimal approach (client-led vs. provider-led) requires further investigation.
    • Understanding patient engagement in goal selection can inform more effective health interventions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the effectiveness of client participation in goal selection versus provider-selected goals for health risk reduction.
    • To evaluate the impact of collaborative versus provider-driven goal setting on specific health behaviors and global health measures.
    • To assess the efficacy of different goal-setting approaches against a no-goal-setting control group.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative study design was employed to assess three groups: collaborative goal setting, provider-selected goals, and no goal setting.
    • Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to compare goal attainment and changes in health risk factors across groups.
    • Paired t-tests were conducted within each group to identify significant changes in specific health behaviors (e.g., alcohol intake, seat belt use, exercise) and global health measures.

    Main Results:

    • No significant difference in overall goal attainment was found between collaborative and provider-selected goal groups.
    • The collaborative goal-setting group showed significantly greater effectiveness in weight reduction.
    • The provider goal-setting group demonstrated greater effectiveness for improving current health age and potential for life expectancy increase.

    Conclusions:

    • While both collaborative and provider-led goal setting can lead to health behavior changes, the optimal approach may depend on the specific health outcome targeted.
    • Collaborative goal setting appears more effective for behavioral changes like weight reduction.
    • Provider-selected goals may be more impactful for improving broader health metrics such as health age and life expectancy potential.

    Related Experiment Videos