Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 3, 2026

07:30
Electromagnetic Navigation Transthoracic Nodule Localization for Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery
Published on: May 4, 2022
3.4K
Modified open-thoracotomy-view approach in robotic-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection
Keisei Tachibana1, Jun Miura1, Yoshifumi Hirata1
1Department of Thoracic and Thyroid Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Journal of Thoracic Disease
|March 20, 2024
Summary
This study introduces a modified open-thoracotomy-view approach (OTVA) for robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) lung resection. Modifications improve surgeon operability and assistant performance without requiring CO2 insufflation.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic Surgery
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Robotic Surgery
Background:
- Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) is a common thoracic procedure.
- The open-thoracotomy-view approach (OTVA) offers a wide view but has limitations.
- These limitations include robotic arm placement issues, suboptimal assistant port positioning, and the need for CO2 insufflation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present modifications to the OTVA to overcome its limitations.
- To enhance surgeon operability and assistant performance in RATS lung resection.
- To introduce a modified 4-port, 3-arm OTVA technique.
Main Methods:
- Modification of the OTVA by repositioning a robotic arm into the lower intercostal space.
- Strategic placement of the assistant port between robotic arms.
- Elimination of the need for CO2 insufflation.
- Application of the modified technique in 20 lung resection cases.
Main Results:
- Enhanced surgeon operability due to improved robotic arm placement.
- Improved assistant performance with closer proximity to the hilum.
- Elimination of CO2 insufflation and associated closed port requirements.
- No critical issues observed in the initial 20 patient cases.
Conclusions:
- The modified OTVA enhances RATS lung resection by improving ergonomics for both surgeon and assistant.
- This technique offers a viable alternative without CO2 insufflation.
- Further evaluation in a larger patient cohort is warranted.

