Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 19, 2026

11:28
A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
12.5K
Estimation of Injury Limits at Vulnerable Impact Locations Along the Forearm Via THUMS AM50 Finite Element Model at
Carson Brewer1, Aryen Shakib2, Julia E de Lange2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street, West Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada.
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
|March 21, 2024
Summary
Airbag impacts can fracture forearms, but the most vulnerable area isn't where previous research assumed. This study reveals the posterior forearm is weakest, suggesting current safety standards may underestimate fracture risk during car crashes.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Automotive Safety
- Injury Mechanics
Background:
- Airbag deployment is a primary cause of upper extremity injuries in automotive collisions.
- Existing research on forearm fracture limits from airbag impacts is limited, often focusing on specific locations like the distal third or midpoint.
- Lack of consensus on the most vulnerable impact site and location variability hinders effective injury prevention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of airbag impact location on forearm injury risk using a detailed computational model.
- To identify the most vulnerable anatomical surface and location for forearm fracture due to airbag deployment.
- To evaluate the predictive capability of bone geometry and soft-tissue depth on forearm injury tolerance.
Main Methods:
- Simulated airbag-level impacts on all four anatomical surfaces of the forearm using the THUMS Finite Element (FE) model.
- Analyzed injury risk across different forearm locations and surfaces.
- Employed linear regression models to correlate fracture risk with bone geometry and soft-tissue depth.
Main Results:
- The distal third of the forearm was not the most vulnerable location for fracture.
- The posterior forearm surface demonstrated the highest vulnerability to fracture.
- Strong correlations were found between forearm fracture risk and cross-sectional area, area moment of inertia, and soft-tissue depth.
Conclusions:
- Forearm fracture risk from airbag deployment is not solely determined by area moment of inertia at assumed vulnerable sites.
- Current automotive safety standards may underestimate forearm fracture risk due to a lack of focus on posterior impacts.
- Predictive models incorporating bone geometry and soft-tissue depth could enhance forearm injury tolerance assessments for improved safety system design.

