Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 7, 2026

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Investigating Causal Brain-behavioral Relationships and their Time Course
Published on: July 18, 2014
Variability of pulse width in transcranial magnetic stimulation
Mirja Osnabruegge1,2, Carolina Kanig1,2, Stefan Schoisswohl1,2
1Institute of Psychology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.
Transcrianeal magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulse width varies between devices and intensities, deviating from manufacturer specifications. This variability, though small within devices, may impact physiological responses.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Physics
Background:
- High variability in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) physiological effects limits measurement generalizability.
- Variability is often attributed to individual brain differences, neglecting physical stimulus properties.
- Systematic investigation of TMS pulse width variability is needed.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically investigate the variability in pulse width across different TMS pulse sources and stimulation intensities.
- To compare pulse widths between various MagVenture® pulse sources and stimulation levels.
- To assess deviations from manufacturer-specified pulse width values.
Main Methods:
- Measured pulse widths of seven MagVenture® pulse sources using a Near Field Probe and oscilloscope.
- Tested stimulation intensities from 10% to 100% in 10% increments.
- Used a consistent C-B60 coil for biphasic pulse delivery.
Main Results:
- The mean pulse width was 288.11 ± 0.37 µs, differing from the manufacturer's 280 µs.
- Significant differences in average pulse width were found between pulse sources and intensities (p < .001).
- Coefficients of variation within groups were low (0.13%-0.67%).
Conclusions:
- TMS pulse width exhibits deviations from manufacturer specifications and varies between devices and intensities.
- Pulse width variability within a single manufacturer's devices is minimal but differs across models.
- Pilot study suggests pulse width variability may affect motor evoked potential latencies, warranting further investigation.
More Related Videos
07:42Combined Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroencephalography of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
Published on: August 17, 2018
14:47Author Spotlight: Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023