Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 30, 2025

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers
Published on: March 14, 2018
Evaluating screening for autism spectrum disorder using cluster randomization
Sigridur Loa Jonsdottir1,2, Evald Saemundsen3,4, Elin Astros Thorarinsdottir5,6
1State Diagnostic and Counseling Center, Dalshraun 1B, 220, Hafnarfjordur, Iceland. sigridur.l.jonsdottir@rgr.is.
A screening program for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in Iceland showed a higher incidence rate in the invited group. However, wide confidence intervals mean more research is needed to confirm if screening is more effective than usual care.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Child Psychology
- Public Health
Background:
- Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis relies on behavioral observation and developmental history.
- Early detection of ASD is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes.
- The effectiveness of screening programs in identifying ASD requires ongoing evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence rate of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children invited to a screening program versus those receiving usual care.
- To assess the diagnostic yield of a targeted ASD screening initiative within primary healthcare settings.
- To evaluate the impact of a cluster-randomized screening intervention on ASD detection rates.
Main Methods:
- A cluster-randomized trial was conducted in Iceland involving 7173 children aged 30 months.
- Children in the intervention group were invited to a specialized ASD screening program.
- Control groups received standard well-child care; diagnoses were confirmed by an interdisciplinary team using ICD-10 criteria over a two-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- The overall cumulative incidence of ASD was 1.66%.
- The invited group showed a higher incidence rate (2.13%) compared to control groups (1.83% and 1.02%).
- Confidence intervals for the incidence rates were wide, limiting definitive conclusions about screening effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- While the screening program identified a higher rate of ASD in the invited group, the results were not statistically conclusive.
- The study highlights the need for further investigation into the efficacy of this ASD screening approach.
- The findings underscore the complexities of ASD detection and the importance of robust diagnostic processes.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Cluster Sampling Method
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Group Design
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
McNemar's Test

